Suppr超能文献

学生对生理学中TEMM模型评估的看法。

Student perspectives of assessment by TEMM model in physiology.

作者信息

Abraham Reem Rachel, Upadhya Subramanya, Torke Sharmila, Ramnarayan K

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Melaka Manipal Medical College, (Manipal Campus), International Centre for Health Sciences, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

Adv Physiol Educ. 2005 Jun;29(2):94-7. doi: 10.1152/advan.00051.2004.

Abstract

Assessment is the process by which the teacher and the student gain knowledge about student progress. Assessment systems should aim at evaluating the desired learning outcomes. In Melaka Manipal Medical College, (Manipal Campus), Manipal, India, the TEMM model (consisting of 4 assessment methods: Triple Jump Test, essay incorporating critical thinking questions, Multistation Integrated Practical Examination, and multiple choice questions) was introduced to 30 refresher students in the fourth block of the academic year. At the end of the block, a questionnaire was distributed to ask the students to rank the different assessments in the order of their preference with respect to seven items. Analysis of the results showed that not a single type of assessment was ranked highest for all the seven items, proving the earlier observation that a single assessment does not fulfill all aspects of assessment and that there is a need for an evaluating system with multiple ways of assessment.

摘要

评估是教师和学生了解学生学习进展的过程。评估体系应旨在评估预期的学习成果。在印度马尼帕尔马六甲马尼帕尔医学院(马尼帕尔校区),向该学年第四学期的30名进修生引入了TEMM模型(由4种评估方法组成:三级跳测试、包含批判性思维问题的论文、多站综合实践考试和多项选择题)。在该学期末,发放了一份问卷,要求学生根据七个项目按照他们的偏好顺序对不同的评估进行排名。结果分析表明,没有一种评估类型在所有七个项目中都排名最高,这证明了之前的观察结果,即单一评估无法满足评估的所有方面,需要一种具有多种评估方式的评估体系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验