[Quality assurance in the urologist's practice. Erectile dysfunction as an example of a multicenter approach to documenting treatment results].

Of 517 urologist practices approached, 93% participated in a pilot study on the quality of care in the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). Treatment modalities and satisfaction were documented for 10,750 ED patients in 2002-at a time when vardenafil and tadalafil had not yet been officially approved. Psychological factors (55%), BPH (42%), and hypertension (33%) were given as the most prevalent ED risk factors; 82% of the patients received sildenafil, 20% apomorphine, 12% yohimbine, and 10% intracavernous alprostadil. Of the patients, 81% were satisfied or very satisfied with one of the treatment options offered and 85% and more were satisfied or very satisfied with sildenafil's onset of action, duration of action, efficacy, and tolerability. Of the physicians, 97% rated the opportunity to compare their own treatment results with other urologists' results as important or very important.