van Geffen E C G, Hugtenburg J G, Heerdink E R, van Hulten R P, Egberts A C G
Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80082, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;61(4):303-7. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0921-x. Epub 2005 May 20.
Tapering of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) therapy, as opposed to abrupt discontinuation, has been recommended by several guidelines and in the literature in order to diminish the occurrence of discontinuation symptoms. However, the evidence of a favourable effect of tapering is limited, and it is unclear how patients ought to discontinue SSRIs in daily life. The aim of this study was to examine the way in which patients discontinue SSRI therapy in clinical practice and to compare the effect of tapering with that of abrupt discontinuation on the occurrence of discontinuation symptoms.
Patients (n = 74) who recently discontinued SSRI therapy completed a questionnaire containing questions about discontinuation symptoms (DESS events), the prescribed SSRI, reasons for discontinuation, way of discontinuation, knowledge of discontinuation symptoms, impact on daily life and patient counseling and education. The number of DESS events was compared among groups (abrupt discontinuation versus tapering; age; male versus female; paroxetine versus other SSRIs; knowledge of discontinuation symptoms at start of therapy versus lack of knowledge).
A total of 66 patients were eligible for analysis. Of all patients ending SSRI therapy, 21% abruptly discontinued therapy. There was a significant difference in the number of DESS events between abrupt discontinuation and tapering of SSRI therapy (12.0 versus 5.9). There was also a tendency for an adverse effect of lack of knowledge of discontinuation symptoms at the start of therapy on the number of DESS events (8.9 versus 5.5).
One in five patients abruptly discontinued their SSRI therapy in clinical practice. Abrupt discontinuation caused a larger increase in the number of discontinuation symptoms than tapering. We therefore advise tapering SSRI therapy in clinical practice to prevent unnecessary adverse effects of discontinuation.
与突然停药相反,几种指南及文献均推荐逐渐减少选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)治疗剂量,以减少停药症状的发生。然而,逐渐减药产生有益效果的证据有限,且不清楚患者在日常生活中应如何停用SSRI。本研究旨在探讨患者在临床实践中停用SSRI治疗的方式,并比较逐渐减药与突然停药对停药症状发生情况的影响。
近期停用SSRI治疗的患者(n = 74)完成了一份问卷,其中包含有关停药症状(DESS事件)、所开具的SSRI、停药原因、停药方式、停药症状知识、对日常生活的影响以及患者咨询与教育等问题。比较各组(突然停药与逐渐减药;年龄;男性与女性;帕罗西汀与其他SSRI;治疗开始时知晓停药症状与不知晓停药症状)的DESS事件数量。
共有66例患者符合分析条件。在所有结束SSRI治疗的患者中,21%突然停药。SSRI治疗突然停药与逐渐减药之间的DESS事件数量存在显著差异(12.0对5.9)。治疗开始时不知晓停药症状对DESS事件数量也有不良影响的趋势(8.9对5.5)。
在临床实践中,五分之一的患者突然停用其SSRI治疗。与逐渐减药相比,突然停药导致停药症状数量增加更多。因此,我们建议在临床实践中逐渐减少SSRI治疗剂量,以预防停药带来的不必要不良反应。