Suppr超能文献

一项前瞻性非随机试验,比较T4期食管癌先行食管切除术后进行放化疗与先行放化疗后进行食管切除术的疗效。

Prospective non-randomized trial comparing esophagectomy-followed-by-chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy-followed-by-esophagectomy for T4 esophageal cancers.

作者信息

Fujita Hirmasa, Sueyoshi Susumu, Tanaka Toshiaki, Tanaka Yuichi, Sasahara Hiroko, Shirouzu Kazuo, Suzuki Gen, Hayabuchi Naofumi, Inutsuka Hiroki

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume City, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 15;90(4):209-19. doi: 10.1002/jso.20259.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Multimodal treatment is commonly adopted for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer. This trial evaluated which therapy offered a better survival: preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or postoperative CRT.

METHODS

Forty-three patients with a T4 esophageal cancer were enrolled in a prospective study in which each patient decided for themselves a treatment arm, CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy or esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group received 36 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) preoperatively, and then 24 Gy radiotherapy and simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively. The esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group received 60 Gy radiotherapy with two cycles of simultaneous chemotherapy using CDDP and 5FU postoperatively.

RESULTS

Of 26 patients who chose CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy, 15 (58%) underwent esophagectomy, while 7 (27%) refused surgery and 4 (15%) were inoperable. Of 17 patients who chose esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT, 14 (82%) underwent esophagectomy, while 3 (18%) underwent inspection thoracotomy. The CRT-followed-by-esophagectomy Group showed a significantly better 5-year-survival rate than the esophagectomy-followed-by-CRT Group (26% vs. 0%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only the response to CRT was prognostic.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial concluded that the first choice of treatment for patients with a T4 esophageal cancer was prior CRT rather than prior esophagectomy.

摘要

背景与目的

T4期食管癌患者通常采用多模式治疗。本试验评估了哪种治疗方式能带来更好的生存率:术前放化疗(CRT)还是术后CRT。

方法

43例T4期食管癌患者参与了一项前瞻性研究,每位患者自行决定治疗组,即先CRT后行食管切除术或先食管切除术后行CRT。先CRT后行食管切除术组术前接受36 Gy放疗及顺铂(CDDP)和5-氟尿嘧啶(5FU)同步化疗,术后接受24 Gy放疗及CDDP和5FU同步化疗。先食管切除术后行CRT组术后接受60 Gy放疗及两个周期的CDDP和5FU同步化疗。

结果

在选择先CRT后行食管切除术的26例患者中,15例(58%)接受了食管切除术,7例(27%)拒绝手术,4例(15%)无法手术。在选择先食管切除术后行CRT的17例患者中,14例(82%)接受了食管切除术,3例(18%)接受了胸腔探查术。先CRT后行食管切除术组的5年生存率显著高于先食管切除术后行CRT组(26%对0%)。多因素分析表明,只有对CRT的反应具有预后意义。

结论

本试验得出结论,T4期食管癌患者的首选治疗方法是先进行CRT而非先进行食管切除术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验