Suppr超能文献

细菌性阴道病的发病率及诊断

Frequency and diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis.

作者信息

Luni Yasmin, Munim Shama, Qureshi Rahat, Tareen Abdul Latif

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 May;15(5):270-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of bacterial vaginosis (BV) in women with vaginal discharge, and to compare different diagnostic tests for its diagnosis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY

The Aga Khan University Hospital from June 1998 to May 2000.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All women attending the Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics at The Aga Khan University Hospital, with the complaints of vaginal discharge, were examined with the help of a speculum. The vaginal pH was measured, samples for bacterial cultures were obtained. A slide was prepared for the gram's stain and Whiff-test was also performed. BV was diagnosed, when the vaginal discharge fulfilled at least three of the composite clinical criteria (Amsel's criteria), a standard method for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: homogenous (pasty) discharge, pH more than 4.5, positive Whiff-test and the presence of clue cells.

RESULTS

The frequency of BV was observed to be 16.1% . The culture for Gardnerella vaginalis was compared with the composite clinical criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the culture, calculated for the diagnosis of BV were 93.8%, 70%, 37.7% and 98% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of laboratory tests in conjunction with clinical findings is necessary for diagnosis of BV. The composite clinical criteria for the diagnosis of BV are rapid, reliable and inexpensive method.

摘要

目的

确定有阴道分泌物的女性中细菌性阴道病(BV)的发生率,并比较其不同诊断测试方法。

设计

横断面研究。

研究地点和时间

1998年6月至2000年5月在阿迦汗大学医院。

患者和方法

所有到阿迦汗大学医院妇产科门诊就诊、主诉有阴道分泌物的女性,均在阴道窥器辅助下进行检查。测量阴道pH值,采集细菌培养样本。制备革兰氏染色玻片并进行胺试验。当阴道分泌物符合至少三项综合临床标准(阿姆斯勒标准)时,诊断为BV,这是诊断细菌性阴道病的标准方法:均质(糊状)分泌物、pH值大于4.5、胺试验阳性及出现线索细胞。

结果

观察到BV的发生率为16.1%。将阴道加德纳菌培养结果与综合临床标准进行比较。计算得出,用于诊断BV的培养方法的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为93.8%、70%、37.7%和98%。

结论

诊断BV需要结合实验室检查和临床发现。BV诊断的综合临床标准是一种快速、可靠且廉价的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验