Broom Alex
School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9UT, UK.
Complement Ther Med. 2005 Mar;13(1):65-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2005.01.001. Epub 2005 Apr 26.
Qualitative methods, such as the in-depth interview, offer a potentially powerful means of uncovering the complex experiences of patients, carers and clinicians within treatment and decision-making processes. In the context of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), qualitative interview-based projects allow for subjectivity and complexity within human experience, making them a powerful tool for increasing our knowledge of important processes within CAM. However, qualitative interview-based projects are often poorly designed, carried out and analysed. This article provides a guide for CAM researchers on how to use qualitative interviews to produce meaningful, and methodologically sound, research findings.
定性方法,如深度访谈,为揭示患者、护理人员和临床医生在治疗及决策过程中的复杂经历提供了一种潜在的有力手段。在补充和替代医学(CAM)的背景下,基于定性访谈的项目能够考虑到人类经历中的主观性和复杂性,使其成为增进我们对补充和替代医学重要过程了解的有力工具。然而,基于定性访谈的项目往往设计、实施和分析得很糟糕。本文为补充和替代医学研究人员提供了一份指南,介绍如何运用定性访谈得出有意义且方法合理的研究结果。