Marr Kieren A, Laverdiere Michel, Gugel Anja, Leisenring Wendy
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Clin Infect Dis. 2005 Jun 15;40(12):1762-9. doi: 10.1086/429921. Epub 2005 May 5.
Reported sensitivity of the galactomannan enzyme immunoassay as an early diagnostic test for invasive aspergillosis (IA) has been widely variable, ranging from 29% to 100% in earlier clinical studies.
Studies performed to date have analyzed performance using per-patient calculations, limiting their ability to measure the impact of clinical variables that change over time, such as receipt of preventive antifungal therapy. In our study, performance of the test was calculated in per-patient and per-test analyses in a large cohort of patients at high risk for IA from 2 North American centers. A total of 272 serum samples obtained from 46 patients with IA and 3005 serum samples obtained from 269 control patients were analyzed using multiple index cutoff values to define positivity.
Per-patient calculations yielded sensitivities of 43% and 70% using index cutoff values of 1.5 and 0.5, respectively; specificity decreased from 93% with use of the 1.5 index cutoff to 70% with use of the 0.5 index cutoff. Per-test calculations yielded sensitivities of 31% and 59% and specificities of 99% and 92% using index cutoff values of 1.5 and 0.5, respectively. Receipt of mold-active antifungal drugs on the day of testing decreased sensitivity; samples obtained from patients not receiving prophylactic or empirical antifungal drugs yielded a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 92% (with use of an index cutoff value of 0.5).
These findings have direct implications for preventive strategies, because the diagnostic utility of the antigen assay is compromised during receipt of prophylactic or empirical antifungal therapies.
半乳甘露聚糖酶免疫测定作为侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的早期诊断试验,其报告的敏感性差异很大,在早期临床研究中从29%到100%不等。
迄今为止进行的研究使用按患者计算的方法分析性能,限制了其测量随时间变化的临床变量影响的能力,如预防性抗真菌治疗的使用情况。在我们的研究中,在来自北美2个中心的一大群IA高危患者中,按患者和按检测分析计算了该试验的性能。使用多个指数临界值定义阳性,对从46例IA患者获得的272份血清样本和从269例对照患者获得的3005份血清样本进行了分析。
按患者计算,使用指数临界值1.5和0.5时,敏感性分别为43%和70%;特异性从使用1.5指数临界值时的93%降至使用0.5指数临界值时的70%。按检测计算,使用指数临界值1.5和0.5时,敏感性分别为31%和59%,特异性分别为99%和92%。检测当天使用抗霉菌活性抗真菌药物会降低敏感性;从未接受预防性或经验性抗真菌药物的患者获得的样本,敏感性为89%,特异性为92%(使用指数临界值0.5)。
这些发现对预防策略有直接影响,因为在接受预防性或经验性抗真菌治疗期间,抗原检测的诊断效用会受到损害。