Huygens Sammy, Schauwvlieghe Alexander, Wlazlo Nick, Moors Ine, Boelens Jerina, Reynders Marijke, Chong Ga-Lai, Klaassen Corné H W, Rijnders Bart J A
Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases and Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Hematology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 May 3;11(6):ofae252. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae252. eCollection 2024 Jun.
An early diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal disease (IFD) is associated with improved outcome, but the moderate sensitivity of noninvasive diagnostic tests makes this challenging. Invasive diagnostic procedures such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) have a higher yield but are not without risk. The detection and sequencing of microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) may facilitate a noninvasive diagnosis.
In a prospective observational study, we collected plasma in the 120 hours preceding or following a BAL in patients with hematological malignancies suspected for a pulmonary IFD. The EORTC/MSGERC2020 criteria were used for IFD classification. Sequencing was performed by Karius (Redwood City, CA) using their Karius Test (KT) on plasma and a "research use only test" on BAL fluid if available. Cases with a probable/proven IFD were identified based on standard diagnostic tests on serum and BAL (microscopy, polymerase chain reaction, galactomannan, culture) and used to calculate the sensitivity, specificity, and additional diagnostic value of the KT.
Of 106 patients enrolled, 39 (37%) had a proven/probable invasive aspergillosis, 7 (7%) a non- IFD, and 4 (4%) a mixed IFD. The KT detected fungal mcfDNA in 29 (28%) patients. Compared with usual diagnostic tests, the sensitivity and specificity were 44.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2-57.7) and 96.6% (95% CI, 88.5%-99.1%). Sensitivity of the KT was higher in non- IFD (:2/3, : 3/5). On BAL, the sensitivity was 72.2% (95% CI, 62.1-96.3), and specificity 83.3% (95% CI, 49.1-87.5).
Sequencing of mcfDNA may facilitate a noninvasive diagnosis of IFD in particular non- IFD. However, on plasma and similar to currently available diagnostics, it cannot be used as a "rule-out" test.
侵袭性真菌病(IFD)的早期诊断和治疗与改善预后相关,但非侵入性诊断测试的中等敏感性使其具有挑战性。诸如支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)等侵入性诊断程序的阳性率较高,但并非没有风险。微生物游离DNA(mcfDNA)的检测和测序可能有助于非侵入性诊断。
在一项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们在疑似肺部IFD的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者进行BAL之前或之后的120小时内收集血浆。EORTC/MSGERC2020标准用于IFD分类。测序由Karius公司(加利福尼亚州红木城)使用其Karius测试(KT)对血浆进行,如有可用的BAL液则对其进行“仅供研究使用的测试”。根据血清和BAL的标准诊断测试(显微镜检查、聚合酶链反应、半乳甘露聚糖、培养)确定可能/确诊的IFD病例,并用于计算KT的敏感性、特异性和额外诊断价值。
在纳入的106例患者中,39例(37%)确诊/可能患有侵袭性曲霉病,7例(7%)为非IFD,4例(4%)为混合性IFD。KT在29例(28%)患者中检测到真菌mcfDNA。与常规诊断测试相比,敏感性和特异性分别为44.0%(95%置信区间[CI],31.2 - 57.7)和96.6%(95% CI,88.5% - 99.1%)。KT在非IFD中的敏感性更高(2/3,3/5)。在BAL上,敏感性为72.2%(95% CI,62.1 - 96.3),特异性为83.3%(95% CI,49.1 - 87.5)。
mcfDNA测序可能有助于IFD尤其是非IFD的非侵入性诊断。然而,在血浆检测方面,与目前可用的诊断方法类似,它不能用作“排除”测试。