Schröder Anke C, Hamann Jörn
Institute for Food Quality and Safety, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany.
J Dairy Res. 2005 May;72(2):153-8. doi: 10.1017/s0022029905000804.
Differential cell count of milk is a traditional parameter for the evaluation of udder health. The literature shows great variation in differential cell counts of the milk of healthy mammary glands: macrophages range from 0% to 80%, lymphocytes from 1.5% to 79.5%, polymorphonuclear neutrophils from 3% to 95%, and epithelial cells from 1% to 19%. We conducted three studies to seek explanations for such variation. In the first, we evaluated the impact of polyethylene and glass sampling bottles. The aim of the second study was to compare the results of differential cell counts performed by three different technicians. The third study evaluated two methods of smear preparation. When polyethylene plastic bottles were used, the macrophage population was minimized but lymphocytes remained unaffected. This was shown by an exemplary flow cytometric analysis using four monoclonal antibodies against three lymphocyte surface structures. There were significant differences in the differential cell counts of 40 smears made by three technicians despite identical operating procedures. For the sediment smear, milk was centrifuged once and the sediment spread by eye on a glass slide. For the "coffee grinder" smear method, the sample was subjected to four centrifugations and then placed on a cover glass in order to spread the sediment using centrifugal force. The coffee grinder procedure led to a reduction of lymphocytes and an enrichment of polymorphonuclear neutrophils without affecting the macrophage population. Both methods made it possible to distinguish different udder health classes. It can be concluded that differential cell counts are a useful tool for comparing and monitoring udder health only if: samples are taken in a glass bottle; smears are prepared with the identical technique; and the differential cell counts are performed by a single person.
乳汁的细胞分类计数是评估乳房健康的传统参数。文献表明,健康乳腺乳汁的细胞分类计数存在很大差异:巨噬细胞占比范围为0%至80%,淋巴细胞为1.5%至79.5%,多形核中性粒细胞为3%至95%,上皮细胞为1%至19%。我们进行了三项研究以探寻这种差异的原因。第一项研究中,我们评估了聚乙烯和玻璃采样瓶的影响。第二项研究的目的是比较三名不同技术人员进行的细胞分类计数结果。第三项研究评估了两种涂片制备方法。使用聚乙烯塑料瓶时,巨噬细胞数量降至最低,但淋巴细胞数量未受影响。这通过使用针对三种淋巴细胞表面结构的四种单克隆抗体进行的典型流式细胞术分析得以证明。尽管操作程序相同,但三名技术人员制作的40张涂片的细胞分类计数存在显著差异。对于沉淀物涂片,将乳汁离心一次,然后凭肉眼将沉淀物铺展在载玻片上。对于“咖啡研磨机”涂片法,样品经过四次离心,然后放置在盖玻片上,以便利用离心力铺展沉淀物。“咖啡研磨机”方法导致淋巴细胞减少,多形核中性粒细胞增多,而巨噬细胞数量不受影响。两种方法都能够区分不同的乳房健康等级。可以得出结论,只有在以下条件下,细胞分类计数才是比较和监测乳房健康的有用工具:样品用玻璃瓶采集;涂片采用相同技术制备;细胞分类计数由同一人进行。