Malashenkov A I, Rusanov N I, Bykova V A, Rychin S V, Aĭteliev A E, Iakovlev S E, Imaev T E
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk. 2005(4):21-5.
33 patients (25 men and 8 women, aged 18 to 69 years, mean age 47 +/- 12.3 years), underwent ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement. During arch replacement the authors used the following brain protection methods: profound hypothermic circulatory arrest--in 4 (12.1%) patients, retrograde brain perfusion via superior vena cava--in 11 (33.3%), antegrade perfusion via brachycephalic vessels--in 18 (54.6%) patients. Pharmacological brain protection was applied in all cases as an addition to the listed techniques. 14 (45%) patients underwent partial aortic arch replacement; in 19 (57.6%) patients total aortic arch replacement was performed, including "elephant trunk" distal anastomosis in 4 cases. Hospital mortality rate in patients who underwent operations on the aortic arch was 18.1% (6 patients). Postoperative neurological disorders, such as transient dysfunction, were observed in 8 (24%) patients; cerebral strokes or intractable neurological disorders were not recorded. The choice of a brain protection method is determined by the extent of the operation and necessary circulation arrest time.
33例患者(25例男性,8例女性,年龄18至69岁,平均年龄47±12.3岁)接受了升主动脉和主动脉弓置换术。在主动脉弓置换术中,作者采用了以下脑保护方法:4例(12.1%)患者采用深度低温循环停搏;11例(33.3%)患者经上腔静脉逆行脑灌注;18例(54.6%)患者经头臂血管顺行灌注。所有病例均在上述技术基础上加用了药物性脑保护。14例(45%)患者接受了部分主动脉弓置换;19例(57.6%)患者进行了全主动脉弓置换,其中4例进行了“象鼻”远端吻合。接受主动脉弓手术患者的医院死亡率为18.1%(6例)。8例(24%)患者出现了术后神经功能障碍,如短暂性功能障碍;未记录到脑卒中和难治性神经功能障碍。脑保护方法的选择取决于手术范围和所需的循环停搏时间。