Ubeda Francisco, Haig David
Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
Genetics. 2005 Jul;170(3):1345-57. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.036889. Epub 2005 May 23.
We present a model of a primary locus subject to viability selection and an unlinked locus that causes sex-specific modification of the segregation ratio at the primary locus. If there is a balanced polymorphism at the primary locus, a population undergoing Mendelian segregation can be invaded by modifier alleles that cause sex-specific biases in the segregation ratio. Even though this effect is particularly strong if reciprocal heterozygotes at the primary locus have distinct viabilities, as might occur with genomic imprinting, it also applies if reciprocal heterozygotes have equal viabilities. The expected outcome of the evolution of sex-specific segregation distorters is all-and-none segregation schemes in which one allele at the primary locus undergoes complete drive in spermatogenesis and the other allele undergoes complete drive in oogenesis. All-and-none segregation results in a population in which all individuals are maximally fit heterozygotes. Unlinked modifiers that alter the segregation ratio are unable to invade such a population. These results raise questions about the reasons for the ubiquity of Mendelian segregation.
我们提出了一个受生存力选择影响的主要位点以及一个导致主要位点分离比例发生性别特异性改变的非连锁位点的模型。如果主要位点存在平衡多态性,那么经历孟德尔分离的种群可能会被导致分离比例出现性别特异性偏差的修饰基因座所侵入。即使主要位点的正反交杂合子具有不同的生存力(如基因组印记可能出现的情况)时这种效应特别强烈,但当正反交杂合子具有相等的生存力时它也适用。性别特异性分离扭曲者进化的预期结果是全有或全无的分离模式,即主要位点的一个等位基因在精子发生过程中完全驱动,另一个等位基因在卵子发生过程中完全驱动。全有或全无的分离导致种群中所有个体都是最大程度适应的杂合子。改变分离比例的非连锁修饰基因座无法侵入这样的种群。这些结果引发了关于孟德尔分离普遍存在的原因的疑问。