Kroll Thilo, Neri Melinda T, Miller Kaye
National Rehabilitation Hospital, Center for Health and Disability Research, Washington, DC 20010-2949, USA.
Rehabil Nurs. 2005 May-Jun;30(3):106-13; discussion 113. doi: 10.1002/j.2048-7940.2005.tb00372.x.
This paper will discuss the theoretical design considerations and the practical integration of quantitative and qualitative methods in disability and rehabilitation research, which have gained recent popularity among researchers of various disciplines. Whereas quantitative experimental and survey approaches allow researchers to draw generalizable conclusions that apply to a particular population as a whole, qualitative methods capture the depth of respondents' experiences in their own words. Qualitative methods may be used to explore new topical areas prior to implementing a population-based survey, or they may follow quantitative approaches to explain findings in greater detail. We will discuss research findings from two recent studies of rehabilitation industry professionals and people with physical disabilities to exemplify the utility of mixed-method designs in disability and rehabilitation research. The article will conclude with recommendations for rehabilitation nursing researchers to apply both qualitative and quantitative methods in their research practice.
本文将讨论残疾与康复研究中定量和定性方法的理论设计考量及实际整合,这些方法近来在各学科研究人员中颇受青睐。定量实验和调查方法能让研究人员得出适用于特定总体人群的可推广结论,而定性方法则能用受访者自己的话捕捉其经历的深度。定性方法可在开展基于人群的调查之前用于探索新的主题领域,也可继定量方法之后更详细地解释研究结果。我们将讨论两项近期针对康复行业专业人员和身体残疾者的研究结果,以例证混合方法设计在残疾与康复研究中的效用。本文最后将为康复护理研究人员在其研究实践中应用定性和定量方法提出建议。