Gehrig Laura M, Sadasivan Kalia K, Marino Andrew A, Albright James A
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, Louisiana 71130-3932, USA.
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005 Apr;34(4):164-6.
We compared a novel external suction drainage (ESD) system with a conventional internal suction drainage (ISD) system in patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasties. Forty-two consecutive patients were studied: 22 who received an ISD system and 20 who received the ESD system. Drainage volume was measured, standardized questionnaires were used to assess patient comfort and response to drain removal, and number of complications were recorded. Significantly less drainage, less pain, and fewer complications occurred in patients treated with the ESD system (P<.05 for each endpoint). Results showed that ESD has advantages over ISD in primary total hip and knee arthroplasties.
我们在接受初次全髋关节或膝关节置换术的患者中,将一种新型的外部吸引引流(ESD)系统与传统的内部吸引引流(ISD)系统进行了比较。连续研究了42例患者:22例接受了ISD系统,20例接受了ESD系统。测量了引流量,使用标准化问卷评估患者舒适度和对拔管的反应,并记录并发症数量。接受ESD系统治疗的患者引流明显减少、疼痛减轻且并发症更少(每个终点的P<0.05)。结果表明,在初次全髋关节和膝关节置换术中,ESD比ISD具有优势。