Etherton Joseph L, Bianchini Kevin J, Greve Kevin W, Heinly Matthew T
Loyola University New Orleans, LA, USA.
Assessment. 2005 Jun;12(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/1073191105274859.
The reliable digit span (RDS) performance of chronic pain patients with unambiguous spinal injuries and no evidence of exaggeration or response bias (n = 53) was compared to that of chronic pain patients meeting criteria for definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction (n = 35), and a group of nonmalingering moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (n = 69). The results demonstrated that scores of 7 or lower were associated with high specificity (> .90) and sensitivity (up to .60) even when moderate to severe TBI are included. Multiple studies have demonstrated that RDS scores of 7 or lower rarely occur in TBI and pain patients who are not intentionally performing poorly on cognitive testing. This study supports the use of the RDS in detecting response bias in neuropsychological patients complaining of pain as well as in the assessment of pain-related cognitive impairment in patients whose primary complaint is pain.
将明确存在脊柱损伤且无夸大或反应偏差证据的慢性疼痛患者(n = 53)的可靠数字广度(RDS)表现,与符合明确伪装神经认知功能障碍标准的慢性疼痛患者(n = 35)以及一组非伪装的中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者(n = 69)进行比较。结果表明,即使纳入了中重度TBI患者,7分及以下的分数仍具有较高的特异性(> .90)和敏感性(高达.60)。多项研究表明,在认知测试中并非故意表现不佳的TBI和疼痛患者中,很少出现7分及以下的RDS分数。本研究支持使用RDS来检测主诉疼痛的神经心理学患者的反应偏差,以及评估以疼痛为主诉的患者的疼痛相关认知障碍。