Suppr超能文献

在伪装的疼痛相关残疾中可靠数字广度的敏感性和特异性。

Sensitivity and specificity of reliable digit span in malingered pain-related disability.

作者信息

Etherton Joseph L, Bianchini Kevin J, Greve Kevin W, Heinly Matthew T

机构信息

Loyola University New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2005 Jun;12(2):130-6. doi: 10.1177/1073191105274859.

Abstract

The reliable digit span (RDS) performance of chronic pain patients with unambiguous spinal injuries and no evidence of exaggeration or response bias (n = 53) was compared to that of chronic pain patients meeting criteria for definite malingered neurocognitive dysfunction (n = 35), and a group of nonmalingering moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients (n = 69). The results demonstrated that scores of 7 or lower were associated with high specificity (> .90) and sensitivity (up to .60) even when moderate to severe TBI are included. Multiple studies have demonstrated that RDS scores of 7 or lower rarely occur in TBI and pain patients who are not intentionally performing poorly on cognitive testing. This study supports the use of the RDS in detecting response bias in neuropsychological patients complaining of pain as well as in the assessment of pain-related cognitive impairment in patients whose primary complaint is pain.

摘要

将明确存在脊柱损伤且无夸大或反应偏差证据的慢性疼痛患者(n = 53)的可靠数字广度(RDS)表现,与符合明确伪装神经认知功能障碍标准的慢性疼痛患者(n = 35)以及一组非伪装的中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者(n = 69)进行比较。结果表明,即使纳入了中重度TBI患者,7分及以下的分数仍具有较高的特异性(> .90)和敏感性(高达.60)。多项研究表明,在认知测试中并非故意表现不佳的TBI和疼痛患者中,很少出现7分及以下的RDS分数。本研究支持使用RDS来检测主诉疼痛的神经心理学患者的反应偏差,以及评估以疼痛为主诉的患者的疼痛相关认知障碍。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验