• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

住在医院和宿舍:有学习困难的人的互动模式。

Living in hospital and hostel: the pattern of interactions of people with learning difficulties.

作者信息

Markova I, Jahoda A, Cattermole M, Woodward D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Scotland.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil Res. 1992 Apr;36 ( Pt 2):115-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1992.tb00488.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2788.1992.tb00488.x
PMID:1591497
Abstract

This study compared interactions between the staff and residents living in hospital wards and in community-based hostels. Twenty-four people with moderate to severe learning difficulties participated in this study. Interactions were categorized according to who was the initiator and recipient, their purpose, attitude of the recipient, duration, and place. It was found that the hospital and hotel residents had virtually no interactions with people outwith the establishment in which they lived. The hostel appeared to offer the residents a sociable environment with more interpersonal interactions and more positive attitudes towards the interactants than the hospital. Interactions in both kinds of setting were very short, thus giving residents little chance to develop communicative skills. It is suggested that a more personal approach, such as joint activities between residents and staff, and living in small groups in ordinary housing, should be the first priorities in the effort to improve the pattern of social interactions of people with moderate to severe learning difficulties.

摘要

这项研究比较了医院病房和社区宿舍中工作人员与居住者之间的互动情况。24名中度至重度学习困难者参与了本研究。互动根据发起者和接受者是谁、互动目的、接受者的态度、持续时间和地点进行分类。研究发现,医院和宿舍的居住者与他们居住场所之外的人几乎没有互动。与医院相比,宿舍似乎为居住者提供了一个社交性更强的环境,人际互动更多,对互动对象的态度也更积极。两种环境中的互动都非常短暂,因此居住者几乎没有机会发展沟通技巧。建议在努力改善中度至重度学习困难者的社交互动模式时,应将更个性化的方法,如居住者与工作人员之间的联合活动以及在普通住房中以小组形式居住,作为首要任务。

相似文献

1
Living in hospital and hostel: the pattern of interactions of people with learning difficulties.住在医院和宿舍:有学习困难的人的互动模式。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1992 Apr;36 ( Pt 2):115-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1992.tb00488.x.
2
Evaluation of a community care project for people with learning difficulties.对学习困难者社区护理项目的评估。
J Ment Defic Res. 1990 Dec;34 ( Pt 6):451-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1990.tb01557.x.
3
A move from hospital to community-based homes for people with learning disabilities: activities outside the home.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1994 Dec;38 ( Pt 6):567-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1994.tb00458.x.
4
Social interactions of persons with developmental disabilities living independently in the community.在社区中独立生活的发育障碍者的社交互动。
Res Dev Disabil. 1995 May-Jun;16(3):149-63. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(95)00004-7.
5
Leaving home: the experience of people with a mental handicap.离家:智障人士的经历。
J Ment Defic Res. 1988 Feb;32 ( Pt 1):47-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1988.tb01387.x.
6
The social and community involvement of older Australians with intellectual disabilities.澳大利亚智障老年人的社会与社区参与情况。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1996 Apr;40 ( Pt 2):120-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2788.1996.719719.x.
7
Clients' community and social contacts: results of a 5-year longitudinal study.客户的社区与社会交往:一项为期5年的纵向研究结果
J Ment Defic Res. 1991 Aug;35 ( Pt 4):308-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1991.tb00404.x.
8
The relationship of staff:client ratios, interactions, and residential placement.员工与客户的比例、互动及居住安置之间的关系。
Res Dev Disabil. 1991;12(3):315-31. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(91)90015-k.
9
An evaluation of hospital-based specialized staffed housing for people with seriously challenging behaviours.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 1992 Aug;36 ( Pt 4):291-307. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.1992.tb00529.x.
10
The behavioral and social ecology of community houses.社区房屋的行为与社会生态
Res Dev Disabil. 1992;13(1):27-42. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(92)90038-8.