Suppr超能文献

一项随机、双盲、双模拟、单剂量、疗效交叉试验,比较了哮喘患者使用氢氟烷烃(pMDI)福莫特罗与干粉吸入器(Aerolizer)福莫特罗以及安慰剂(pMDI或Aerolizer)的效果。

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, single-dose, efficacy crossover trial comparing formoterol-HFA (pMDI) versus formoterol-DPI (Aerolizer) and placebo (pMDI or Aerolizer) in asthmatic patients.

作者信息

Bousquet J, Huchon G, Leclerc V, Vicaut E, Lefrançois G

机构信息

Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Respiration. 2005;72 Suppl 1:6-12. doi: 10.1159/000083687.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) have traditionally been used as propellants in pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs), which are often used to deliver drugs to the lungs for the treatment of reversible obstructive airways diseases. However, CFCs are harmful to the environment and need to be phased out. Hydrofluoroalkanes (HFAs), such as HFA-134a, represent a safe alternative to CFC propellants for use with pMDIs. Formoterol fumarate has been recently formulated in an HFA-134a-containing pMDI and is undergoing clinical testing with the aim of providing an effective, safe and environmentally-friendly alternative to currently existing formulations.

OBJECTIVES

The study objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority (clinical equivalence) of the HFA-134a-propelled formoterol pMDI versus the formoterol Aerolizer dry powder inhaler (DPI).

METHODS

The study was a single dose, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, placebo and reference product controlled, three-periods, crossover trial in 49 patients with moderate-to-severe stable asthma. The active treatments involved a single 12-microg dose of formoterol delivered from an HFA-134a-propelled pMDI and an Aerolizer DPI. The primary efficacy parameter was the average 12-hour forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), calculated as area under the 12-hour post-morning dose FEV1 time curve divided by time (hours).

RESULTS

Mean 12-hour average FEV1 was 2.28 liters for placebo, 2.60 liters for formoterol pMDI and 2.60 liters for the formoterol DPI. Contrast analysis showed that the HFA-propelled formoterol pMDI was significantly superior to placebo in terms of 12-hour average FEV1. Further statistical analysis confirmed bronchodilation with the pMDI formoterol formulation which was clinically equivalent to that seen with the DPI formoterol formulation. All treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchodilatory effect of a 12-microg dose of formoterol inhaled from a CFC-free, HFA-propelled pMDI is significantly superior to placebo and equivalent to a commercially available formoterol DPI.

摘要

背景

氯氟烃(CFCs)传统上一直用作压力定量吸入器(pMDIs)的推进剂,pMDIs常用于将药物输送至肺部以治疗可逆性阻塞性气道疾病。然而,CFCs对环境有害,需要逐步淘汰。氢氟烷烃(HFAs),如HFA - 134a,是用于pMDIs的CFC推进剂的安全替代品。富马酸福莫特罗最近已被制成含HFA - 134a的pMDI,并正在进行临床试验,目的是为现有制剂提供一种有效、安全且环保的替代品。

目的

本研究的目的是证明HFA - 134a推进的福莫特罗pMDI相对于福莫特罗干粉吸入器(DPI)的非劣效性(临床等效性)。

方法

该研究是一项单剂量、双盲、双模拟、随机、安慰剂和参比产品对照、三阶段交叉试验,纳入49例中重度稳定哮喘患者。活性治疗包括从HFA - 134a推进的pMDI和Aerolizer DPI中吸入单剂量12微克的福莫特罗。主要疗效参数是平均12小时第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1),计算方法为早晨给药后12小时FEV1时间曲线下面积除以时间(小时)。

结果

安慰剂组的平均12小时FEV1为2.28升,福莫特罗pMDI组为2.60升,福莫特罗DPI组为2.60升。对比分析表明,HFA推进的福莫特罗pMDI在12小时平均FEV1方面显著优于安慰剂。进一步的统计分析证实,pMDI福莫特罗制剂的支气管扩张作用在临床上与DPI福莫特罗制剂相当。所有治疗耐受性良好。

结论

从不含CFC、HFA推进的pMDI吸入12微克剂量福莫特罗的支气管扩张作用显著优于安慰剂,且等同于市售的福莫特罗DPI。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验