Department of Allergology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Białystok, Białystok, Poland.
BMC Pulm Med. 2011 May 23;11:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-11-28.
The inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) fluticasone propionate (fluticasone) and the long-acting β2-agonist (LABA) formoterol fumarate (formoterol) are being made available as a combination product (fluticasone/formoterol, flutiform ®) in a single aerosol inhaler. This 12-week, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 study compared the efficacy and safety of fluticasone/formoterol with the commercially available combination product fluticasone/salmeterol.
Patients aged ≥ 18 years (N = 202) with mild-to-moderate-severe, persistent asthma for ≥ 6 months prior to screening were included in the study. After a screening phase (4-10 days), eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive fluticasone/formoterol or fluticasone/salmeterol during the 12-week treatment period. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of fluticasone/formoterol versus fluticasone/salmeterol, measured by pre-dose forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), at week 12.
Fluticasone/formoterol was comparable to fluticasone/salmeterol for the primary efficacy endpoint, mean pre-dose FEV1 at week 12. The new combination was also comparable to fluticasone/salmeterol for change from baseline to week 12 in pre-dose FEV1, change from pre-dose FEV1 at baseline to 2-hour post-dose FEV1 at week 12 and discontinuations due to lack of efficacy. Importantly, fluticasone/formoterol was superior to fluticasone/salmeterol in time to onset of action throughout the duration of the study. The two treatments demonstrated similar results for various other secondary efficacy parameters, including other lung function tests, patient-reported outcomes, rescue medication use, asthma exacerbations and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire scores. Fluticasone/formoterol was well tolerated and had a good safety profile that was similar to fluticasone/salmeterol.
The results of this study indicate that fluticasone/formoterol is as effective as fluticasone/salmeterol, and has a more rapid onset of action, reflecting the faster bronchodilatory effects of formoterol compared with those of salmeterol. If patients perceive the benefits of therapy with fluticasone/formoterol more rapidly than with fluticasone/salmeterol, this could have a positive impact on preference and adherence.
吸入性皮质类固醇(ICS)丙酸氟替卡松(氟替卡松)和长效β2-激动剂(LABA)富马酸福莫特罗(福莫特罗)作为一种组合产品(氟替卡松/福莫特罗,氟替卡松/福莫特罗)在单一气雾剂吸入器中提供。这项为期 12 周、开放性标签、随机、活性对照、平行组、多中心、3 期研究比较了氟替卡松/福莫特罗与市售组合产品氟替卡松/沙美特罗的疗效和安全性。
年龄≥18 岁(N=202)的患者在筛选前有≥6 个月的轻度至中度重度、持续性哮喘,符合条件。在筛选阶段(4-10 天)后,合格患者被随机 1:1 接受氟替卡松/福莫特罗或氟替卡松/沙美特罗治疗,为期 12 周。主要目的是证明氟替卡松/福莫特罗与氟替卡松/沙美特罗相比非劣效性,通过 12 周时的预剂量用力呼气第一秒(FEV1)来衡量。
氟替卡松/福莫特罗与氟替卡松/沙美特罗在主要疗效终点(第 12 周时的预剂量 FEV1)上相当。新的组合在第 12 周时的预剂量 FEV1变化、从基线到第 12 周时的预剂量 FEV1到 2 小时后剂量 FEV1的变化以及由于缺乏疗效而停药方面也与氟替卡松/沙美特罗相当。重要的是,氟替卡松/福莫特罗在整个研究期间的作用开始时间上优于氟替卡松/沙美特罗。两种治疗方法在其他各种次要疗效参数上的结果相似,包括其他肺功能测试、患者报告的结果、急救药物使用、哮喘恶化和哮喘生活质量问卷评分。氟替卡松/福莫特罗耐受性良好,安全性与氟替卡松/沙美特罗相似。
这项研究的结果表明,氟替卡松/福莫特罗与氟替卡松/沙美特罗同样有效,且作用开始更快,反映了福莫特罗与沙美特罗相比更快的支气管扩张作用。如果患者认为使用氟替卡松/福莫特罗治疗的益处比使用氟替卡松/沙美特罗更快,这可能会对偏好和依从性产生积极影响。