Barton Garry R, Bankart John, Davis Adrian C
MRC Institute of Hearing Research, University Park, Nottingham, UK.
Int J Audiol. 2005 Mar;44(3):157-63. doi: 10.1080/14992020500057566.
The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of life of hearing-impaired adults, as assessed by three different utility measures - the EuroQol (EQ-5D), the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3), and the SF-6D (derived from the SF-36 questionnaire). Measuring quality of life in terms of utility enables the benefits of many interventions to be compared on a common scale, where 0 corresponds to death and 1 to perfect health. Utility scores for 915 new referrals (mean age 69 years, 55% male) to four UK audiology clinics were estimated. The mean utility scores on the EQ-5D (0.79), SF-6D (0.77), and HUI3 (0.56) were all significantly different from each other The agreement between measures was most commonly moderate according to the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC =0.36 to 0.58). This suggests that different utility measures will provide different estimates of the effectiveness of hearing aid provision.
本研究的目的是比较听力受损成年人的生活质量,该生活质量通过三种不同的效用测量方法进行评估,即欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ-5D)、健康效用指数第三版(HUI3)以及SF-6D(源自SF-36问卷)。从效用角度衡量生活质量能够在一个通用尺度上比较多种干预措施的益处,其中0代表死亡,1代表完美健康。对英国四家听力诊所的915名新转诊患者(平均年龄69岁,55%为男性)的效用得分进行了估算。EQ-5D(0.79)、SF-6D(0.77)和HUI3(0.56)的平均效用得分彼此之间均存在显著差异。根据组内相关系数(ICC = 0.36至0.58),各测量方法之间的一致性大多为中等程度。这表明不同的效用测量方法会对助听器提供的效果给出不同的估计。