Muindi Josephia R, Potter Douglas M, Peng Yibing, Johnson Candace S, Trump Donald L
Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;56(5):492-6. doi: 10.1007/s00280-005-1015-2. Epub 2005 May 26.
The non linear relationship between calcitriol (1,25-D(3)) dose and AUC in cancer patients suggests that the commercially available caplet 1,25-D(3) formulation (Rocaltrol) cannot achieve the high systemic exposure associated with antitumor activity in animal models. The primary objective of this analysis was to determine whether a liquid 1,25-D(3) formulation had a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. This analysis was based on the results obtained in 2 phase I clinical studies seeking to determine the maximum tolerated dose of 1,25-D(3) administered in combination with either dexamethasone or paclitaxel daily for three consecutive days weekly. Data were available for 12 patients treated with the caplet formulation at doses ranging from 12 microg to 21 microg, and for 16 patients treated with the liquid formulation at doses ranging from 13 microg to 36 microg; data for 19 patients were available at doses for which both formulations were used. There were no differences in C(max) and AUC(0-24 h) between the two formulations (P > 0.17) As was noted with the caplet formulation, dose-related proportional increases in C(max) and AUC(0-24 h) were not observed with liquid 1,25-D(3) at doses > or = 13 microg (P > 0.83). We conclude that the commercially available liquid 1,25-D(3) formulation offers no PK advantage over caplet formulation.
在癌症患者中,骨化三醇(1,25 - D(3))剂量与AUC之间的非线性关系表明,市售的1,25 - D(3)胶囊制剂(罗钙全)无法达到动物模型中与抗肿瘤活性相关的高全身暴露水平。本分析的主要目的是确定液体1,25 - D(3)制剂是否具有更有利的药代动力学特征。该分析基于两项I期临床研究的结果,这两项研究旨在确定连续三天每周每日联合地塞米松或紫杉醇给药时1,25 - D(3)的最大耐受剂量。有12名患者接受了剂量范围为12μg至21μg的胶囊制剂治疗的数据,以及16名患者接受了剂量范围为13μg至36μg的液体制剂治疗的数据;有19名患者在两种制剂均使用的剂量下的数据可用。两种制剂之间的C(max)和AUC(0 - 24 h)无差异(P > 0.17)。正如胶囊制剂所观察到的,在剂量≥13μg时,液体1,25 - D(3)未观察到C(max)和AUC(0 - 24 h)与剂量相关的比例增加(P > 0.83)。我们得出结论,市售的液体1,25 - D(3)制剂在药代动力学方面并不优于胶囊制剂。