Topol E J, Califf R M, Vandormael M, Grines C L, George B S, Sanz M L, Wall T, O'Brien M, Schwaiger M, Aguirre F V
Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.
Circulation. 1992 Jun;85(6):2090-9. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.85.6.2090.
Experimental and observational clinical studies of acute coronary occlusion have suggested that late reperfusion prevents infarct expansion and facilitates myocardial healing. The purpose of this trial was to assess whether infarct vessel patency could be achieved in late-entry patients and what benefit, if any, can be demonstrated.
In a double-blind fashion, 197 patients with 6 to 24 hours of symptoms and ECG ST elevation were randomly assigned to tissue-type plasminogen activator (100 mg over 2 hours) or placebo. Coronary angiography within 24 hours was used to determine infarct vessel patency status. Patients with infarct-related occluded arteries were then eligible for a second randomization to either angioplasty (34 patients) or no angioplasty (37 patients). Ventricular function and cavity size were reassessed at 1 month by gated blood pool scintigraphy and at 6 months by repeat cardiac catheterization. The primary end point, infarct vessel patency, was 65% for plasminogen activator patients compared with 27% in the placebo group (p less than 0.0001). There were no differences between these groups in ejection fraction or infarct zone regional wall motion at 1 or 6 months. At 6 months, infarct vessel patency was 59% in both groups. In the placebo group, there was a significant increase in end-diastolic volume from acute phase of 127 ml to 159 ml at 6-month follow-up (p = 0.006) but no increase in cavity size for the plasminogen activator group patients. Coronary angioplasty was associated with an initial 81% recanalization success and improved ventricular function at 1 month, but by late follow-up no advantage could be demonstrated for this procedure, and there was a 38% spontaneous recanalization rate in the patients assigned to no angioplasty.
The study demonstrates that it is possible to achieve infarct vessel recanalization in the majority of late-entry patients with either thrombolytic therapy or angioplasty. Thrombolytic intervention had a favorable effect on prevention of cavity dilatation and left ventricular remodeling, but there are no late benefits on systolic function after thrombolysis or coronary angioplasty. The conclusions concerning overall potential benefit of applying late reperfusion therapy will require data from large-scale trials designed to assess mortality reduction.
急性冠状动脉闭塞的实验性和观察性临床研究表明,延迟再灌注可防止梗死扩展并促进心肌愈合。本试验的目的是评估晚期就诊患者能否实现梗死血管再通,以及是否能证明有任何益处。
采用双盲方式,将197例症状持续6至24小时且心电图ST段抬高的患者随机分为组织型纤溶酶原激活剂组(2小时内静脉注射100毫克)或安慰剂组。在24小时内进行冠状动脉造影以确定梗死血管通畅情况。梗死相关动脉闭塞的患者随后有资格进行第二次随机分组,分为血管成形术组(34例患者)或非血管成形术组(37例患者)。在1个月时通过门控血池闪烁扫描重新评估心室功能和腔室大小,在6个月时通过重复心脏导管检查进行评估。主要终点指标梗死血管通畅率,组织型纤溶酶原激活剂组患者为65%,而安慰剂组为27%(p<0.0001)。在1个月或6个月时,这些组之间的射血分数或梗死区域室壁运动没有差异。在6个月时,两组的梗死血管通畅率均为59%。在安慰剂组中,舒张末期容积从急性期的127毫升显著增加至6个月随访时的159毫升(p=0.006),而组织型纤溶酶原激活剂组患者的腔室大小没有增加。冠状动脉成形术初始再通成功率为81%,且在1个月时心室功能有所改善,但在后期随访中未能证明该手术有优势,在非血管成形术组患者中有38%的自发再通率。
该研究表明,对于大多数晚期就诊患者,通过溶栓治疗或血管成形术有可能实现梗死血管再通。溶栓干预对预防腔室扩张和左心室重构有有利影响,但溶栓或冠状动脉成形术后对收缩功能没有晚期益处。关于应用延迟再灌注治疗总体潜在益处的结论将需要来自旨在评估死亡率降低情况的大规模试验的数据。