Kara Sadik, Kemaloglu Semra, Erdogan Nuri
Department of Electrical Engineering, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey.
Comput Biol Med. 2006 May;36(5):484-94. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.03.001.
In this study, we have compared the efficacy of autoregressive modelling (ARM) and fast Fourier transformation (FFT) of Doppler signals from lower extremity veins of healthy volunteers in various physiologic situations. Compared to FFT, ARM produced smooth spectra and less spectral broadening both in sonograms and power spectra. However, faulty positioning of the peaks along the time axis in FFT-derived power spectral density curves show that FFT is not a suitable method if these graphs are to be used as a diagnostic tool. Analysis of ARM-based venous sonograms and power spectral density graphs revealed that FFT should not be used in signals with high power spectral density levels and low-frequency bandwidth within limited segments of time.
在本研究中,我们比较了自回归建模(ARM)和快速傅里叶变换(FFT)在各种生理情况下对健康志愿者下肢静脉多普勒信号的处理效果。与FFT相比,ARM在声谱图和功率谱中均产生了更平滑的频谱且频谱展宽更小。然而,FFT得出的功率谱密度曲线中峰值在时间轴上的定位有误,这表明如果要将这些图表用作诊断工具,FFT并非合适的方法。对基于ARM的静脉声谱图和功率谱密度图的分析表明,在有限时间段内具有高功率谱密度水平和低频带宽的信号中不应使用FFT。