Xie Ren Guo, Tang Jin Bo
Department of Hand Surgery, Hand Surgery Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):461-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2005.02.006.
Locking sutures have proven beneficial to the strength of the repaired tendon. In this study we investigated the effects of 3 locks in the tendon-suture junction and their effect on repair strength.
Forty-seven fresh pig flexor tendons were transected and repaired using 4-strand repairs with 3 different configurations of locks in each tendon-suture junction: 1 exposed cross-lock, 1 embedded cross-lock, and 1 circle lock. The tendons were subjected to a linear noncyclic load-to-failure test using a tensile testing machine. The initial gap, the 2-mm gap force, and the ultimate strength were measured to compare the biomechanical performance for each repair.
Despite noticeable differences in the configurations of locks the gap formation force and ultimate strength were not significantly different among the 3 tested locking configurations.
An exposed cross-lock, an embedded cross-lock, and a circle lock at tendon-suture junctions had similar locking power. Circle-lock repairs without cross-locking components produce tensile strength similar to cross-locking repairs. The findings of this study suggest that the creation of cross-configurations in locking repairs used conventionally by many surgeons is not essential to repair strength and that circle locking is as efficient as cross-locking in the repair of lacerated flexor tendons.
锁定缝线已被证明对修复肌腱的强度有益。在本研究中,我们调查了肌腱-缝线连接处的3种锁定方式及其对修复强度的影响。
47条新鲜猪屈肌腱被切断,采用4股修复法进行修复,每个肌腱-缝线连接处有3种不同的锁定配置:1种外露十字锁、1种埋入式十字锁和1种环形锁。使用拉伸试验机对肌腱进行线性非循环加载至失效测试。测量初始间隙、2毫米间隙力和极限强度,以比较每种修复方法的生物力学性能。
尽管锁定方式存在明显差异,但在3种测试的锁定配置中,间隙形成力和极限强度并无显著差异。
肌腱-缝线连接处的外露十字锁、埋入式十字锁和环形锁具有相似的锁定力。没有十字锁定组件的环形锁修复产生的拉伸强度与十字锁修复相似。本研究结果表明,许多外科医生传统上使用的锁定修复中创建十字配置对于修复强度并非必不可少,并且环形锁定在修复屈指肌腱裂伤方面与十字锁定一样有效。