Xie Ren Guo, Xue Hong Guang, Gu Jian Hui, Tan Jun, Tang Jin Bo
Department of Hand Surgery, Hand Surgery Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 May;30(3):455-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2004.12.012.
The area of the tendon within the locking suture configuration of the modified Pennington repair is an important determinant of eventual tendon strength. This 2-strand repair's loop configurations encompass a large cross-sectional area of the tendon. Many recently proposed repairs, however, consist of locks in a number of narrow sites on the tendon surface and most are multistranded. It is not clear how the area within the locks affects tendon strength and whether the effects of locking areas change according to the number of repair strands. In this study we investigate the effects of locking area on repair strength of 2- and 4-strand tendon repairs.
Sixty-five fresh pig flexor tendons were divided equally into 6 groups and were transected completely. They were repaired with 2- or 4-strand techniques. The tendon-suture interface was a circle-locking junction and diameters of the locks were 1, 2, or 3 mm. The tendons were pulled in a tensile testing machine until failure of the repair and the mode of failure, 2-mm gap force, and ultimate strength were measured.
In the tendons with either 2- or 4-strand repairs locks with a diameter of 2 or 3 mm had significantly greater gap formation force and ultimate strength than those of 1 mm. The gap formation and ultimate forces were not statistically different between tendons with locks of 2 or 3 mm in diameter.
In both the 2- and 4-strand tendon repairs tested in this study repair strength increased as the diameter of locks of the repair increased from 1 mm to 2 or 3 mm. An increase in the diameter from 2 mm to 3 mm, however, did not increase the gap force and ultimate strength. These findings indicate that the cross-sectional area within the locks affects repair strength when the diameter of the locks is within a certain range (2 mm) and that further enlargement of the locking area does not increase strength.
改良彭宁顿修复术的锁定缝线结构内肌腱的面积是最终肌腱强度的重要决定因素。这种双股修复的环结构包含肌腱的大横截面面积。然而,最近提出的许多修复方法是在肌腱表面的多个狭窄部位进行锁定,并且大多数是多股的。尚不清楚锁定部位内的面积如何影响肌腱强度,以及锁定区域的影响是否会根据修复股数而改变。在本研究中,我们调查了锁定面积对双股和四股肌腱修复强度的影响。
65条新鲜猪屈肌腱被平均分为6组并完全横断。它们采用双股或四股技术进行修复。肌腱-缝线界面为环形锁定连接,锁定直径为1、2或3毫米。将肌腱在拉伸试验机中拉伸直至修复失败,并测量失败模式、2毫米间隙力和极限强度。
在双股或四股修复的肌腱中,直径为2或3毫米的锁定结构比1毫米的锁定结构具有显著更大的间隙形成力和极限强度。直径为2或3毫米的锁定结构的肌腱之间的间隙形成力和极限力在统计学上没有差异。
在本研究测试的双股和四股肌腱修复中,随着修复锁定直径从1毫米增加到2或3毫米,修复强度增加。然而,直径从2毫米增加到3毫米并没有增加间隙力和极限强度。这些发现表明,当锁定直径在一定范围内(2毫米)时,锁定结构内的横截面积会影响修复强度,并且锁定面积的进一步扩大不会增加强度。