San Martin-Lopez Alma Luz, Garrigos-Esparza Luis David, Torre-Delgadillo Gabriela, Gordillo-Moscoso Antonio, Hernandez-Sierra Juan Francisco, de Pozos-Guillen Amaury Jesus
Facultad de Estomatología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México.
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2005 Spring;29(3):239-43. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.29.3.jgh607l870051882.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate pain perception rates in pediatric patients by comparing computerized injection device and traditional injection procedure. In a clinical trial, by using a crossover design, sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to receive, in consecutive sessions, dental anesthetic techniques with either traditional or computerized device. Visual Analogue Scale qualification and heart rate monitoring as physiologic indicator of pain response were used for the evaluation. Results showed that traditional syringe injections were more painful than computerized injection device (p < 0.001). Results suggested that computerized injection device reduces pain perception compared to the traditional syringe during the dental anesthetic management.
本研究的目的是通过比较计算机化注射装置和传统注射程序,评估儿科患者的疼痛感知率。在一项临床试验中,采用交叉设计,将64名患者随机分配,使其在连续的疗程中分别接受使用传统或计算机化装置的牙科麻醉技术。使用视觉模拟评分法进行评定,并将心率监测作为疼痛反应的生理指标用于评估。结果显示,传统注射器注射比计算机化注射装置更疼(p < 小于0.001)。结果表明,在牙科麻醉管理中,与传统注射器相比,计算机化注射装置可降低疼痛感知。