The value of an ethics history?
作者信息
Das Abhay K, Mulley Graham P
机构信息
Geriatric and General Medicine, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS3, UK.
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2005 Jun;98(6):262-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680509800605.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The value of an ethics history?伦理学史的价值？
J R Soc Med. 2005 Jun;98(6):262-6. doi: 10.1177/014107680509800605.
2
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: nurses and the law.心肺复苏：护士与法律
Nurs Stand. 2007;22(4):35-40. doi: 10.7748/ns2007.10.22.4.35.c4619.
3
Advance directives, proxies, and the practice of surgery.预立医疗指示、代理人与外科手术实践
Am J Surg. 1992 Mar;163(3):277-81; discussion 82. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90001-8.
4
Precedent autonomy: life-sustaining intervention and the demented patient.先例自主性：维持生命的干预措施与痴呆患者
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1999 Spring;8(2):189-99. doi: 10.1017/s0963180199802084.
5
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 8. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions.《2005年欧洲复苏委员会复苏指南》。第8节。复苏伦理与临终决策。
Resuscitation. 2005 Dec;67 Suppl 1:S171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.005.
6
Ethics and Law: The Many Tensions.伦理与法律：诸多矛盾
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):77-79. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1314052.
7
Medical ethics in the future: commentary on Andre De Vries.未来的医学伦理：对安德烈·德·弗里斯的评论
Metamedicine. 1982 Feb;3(1):129-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00882722.
8
Ethical concerns in end-of-life care.临终关怀中的伦理问题。
Am J Nurs. 2003 Jan;103(1):48-55; quiz 56. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200301000-00021.
9
Dworkin on dementia. Elegant theory, questionable policy.德沃金论痴呆症。理论精妙，政策存疑。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Nov-Dec;25(6):32-8.
10
Decisions and care at the end of life.临终决策与护理
Lancet. 1995 Jul 15;346(8968):163-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91215-0.
引用本文的文献
1
Taking an "ethics history".进行“伦理学史回顾”。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Oct;98(10):442. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801004.
2
Taking an "ethics history".进行“伦理学史回顾”。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Oct;98(10):442-3. doi: 10.1177/014107680509801005.
3
Taking an 'ethics history'.进行一次“伦理学史回顾”。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Sep;98(9):435-6; author reply 436. doi: 10.1177/014107680509800921.
4
Decision making at the end of life: shifting sands.临终决策：变幻莫测。
J R Soc Med. 2005 Jul;98(7):297-8. doi: 10.1177/014107680509800701.
本文引用的文献
1
Current legal status of advance directives in the United States.美国预先医疗指示的当前法律状况。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Jul 15;116(13):420-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03040929.
2
Promoting advance directives among elderly primary care patients.在老年初级保健患者中推广预先指示。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):944-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30117.x.
3
Living will, resuscitation preferences, and attitudes towards life in an aged population.老年人群的生前预嘱、复苏偏好及对生活的态度
Gerontology. 2004 Jul-Aug;50(4):247-54. doi: 10.1159/000078354.
4
Bill clarifies gap in law over living wills.法案澄清了生前遗嘱方面的法律漏洞。
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7455.1516-d.
5
Advance care planning for fatal chronic illness: avoiding commonplace errors and unwarranted suffering.致命性慢性病的预先照护计划：避免常见错误及无端痛苦。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 20;138(10):812-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-10-200305200-00009.
6
Where now with Do Not Attempt Resuscitation decisions?现在“不进行心肺复苏”的决定情况如何？
Age Ageing. 2003 Mar;32(2):143-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/32.2.143.
7
Perspectives on CPR: resuscitation or resurrection?心肺复苏的观点：复苏还是复活？
Clin Med (Lond). 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):457-60. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.1-6-457.
8
Decisions Relating to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a joint statement from the British Medical Association, the Resuscitation Council (UK) and the Royal College of Nursing.关于心肺复苏的决策：英国医学协会、英国复苏委员会和皇家护理学院的联合声明
J Med Ethics. 2001 Oct;27(5):310-6; discussion 317-23. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.5.310.
9
The value of taking an 'ethics history'.进行“伦理学史”研究的价值。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27(2):114-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.2.114.
10
New UK guidance on resuscitation calls for open decision making.英国关于复苏的新指南提倡开放决策。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 3;322(7285):509.
Zotero 插件