相似文献
1
The law and ACTG protocol 076: do the slings and arrows of mandatory HIV testing penetrate a woman's right to privacy.
Linc Law Rev. 1999;25/26:1-23.
2
Ryan White care amendments: mandatory HIV testing of newborns and a woman's right to privacy.
DePaul J Health Care Law. 1996 Winter;1(2):373-93.
3
Mandatory newborn HIV testing.
J Nurs Law. 1999;6(1):33-7.
4
Perinatal HIV transmission: a children's human rights perspective.
Child Leg Rights J. 1998 Spring;18(2):6-19.
5
HIV testing of pregnant women: a policy analysis.
J Public Health Policy. 1997;18(4):401-32.
6
Mandatory HIV testing and treating of child-bearing women: an unnatural, illegal, and unsound approach.
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 1997 Spring;28(3):469-99.
7
Mandatory HIV testing: an Orwellian proposition.
St Johns Law Rev. 1998 Winter;72(1):103-39.
8
Mandatory testing of pregnant women: a strategy for challenging the law.
AIDS Policy Law. 1996 Aug 9;11(14):suppl 1-2.
9
Is mama a criminal? An analysis of potential criminal liability of HIV-infected pregnant women in the context of mandated drug therapy.
Drake Law Rev. 2002;50(2):293-314.
10
At what cost?: an argument against mandatory AZT treatment of HIV-positive pregnant women.
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev. 1997 Summer;32(2):492-528.
Zotero 插件