Suppr超能文献

视觉搜索透明度和不透明度:线索组合的注意引导?

Visual search for transparency and opacity: attentional guidance by cue combination?

作者信息

Wolfe Jeremy M, Birnkrant Randall S, Kunar Melina A, Horowitz Todd S

机构信息

Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

J Vis. 2005 Mar 30;5(3):257-74. doi: 10.1167/5.3.9.

Abstract

A series of seven experiments explored search for opaque targets among transparent distractors or vice versa. Static stimuli produced very inefficient search. With moving items, search for an opaque target among transparent distractors was quite efficient while search for transparent targets was less efficient (Experiment 1). Transparent and opaque items differed from each other on the basis of motion cues, luminance cues, and figural cues (e.g., junction type). Motion cues were not sufficient to support efficient search (Experiments 2-5). Violations of the luminance rules of transparency disrupt search (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 5 shows that search becomes inefficient if X-junctions are removed. Experiments 6 and 7 show that efficient search survives if X-junctions are occluded. It appears that guidance of attention to an opaque target is guidance based on "cue combination" (M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston, & M. Young, 1995). Several cues must be present to produce a difference between opaque and transparent surfaces that is adequate to guide attention.

摘要

一系列七个实验探究了在透明干扰物中搜索不透明目标,或者反之在不透明干扰物中搜索透明目标的情况。静态刺激产生的搜索效率极低。对于移动的物体,在透明干扰物中搜索不透明目标相当高效,而搜索透明目标的效率则较低(实验1)。透明和不透明物体在运动线索、亮度线索和图形线索(例如连接类型)方面存在差异。运动线索不足以支持高效搜索(实验2 - 5)。违反透明度的亮度规则会干扰搜索(实验3和4)。实验5表明,如果去除X形连接,搜索效率就会变低。实验6和7表明,如果X形连接被遮挡,高效搜索仍能进行。看来,将注意力导向不透明目标的引导是基于“线索组合”(M. S. 兰迪、L. T. 马洛尼、E. B. 约翰斯顿和M. 杨,1995)。必须存在多个线索,才能在不透明和透明表面之间产生足以引导注意力的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验