Wolfe Jeremy M, Birnkrant Randall S, Kunar Melina A, Horowitz Todd S
Brigham & Women's Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J Vis. 2005 Mar 30;5(3):257-74. doi: 10.1167/5.3.9.
A series of seven experiments explored search for opaque targets among transparent distractors or vice versa. Static stimuli produced very inefficient search. With moving items, search for an opaque target among transparent distractors was quite efficient while search for transparent targets was less efficient (Experiment 1). Transparent and opaque items differed from each other on the basis of motion cues, luminance cues, and figural cues (e.g., junction type). Motion cues were not sufficient to support efficient search (Experiments 2-5). Violations of the luminance rules of transparency disrupt search (Experiments 3 and 4). Experiment 5 shows that search becomes inefficient if X-junctions are removed. Experiments 6 and 7 show that efficient search survives if X-junctions are occluded. It appears that guidance of attention to an opaque target is guidance based on "cue combination" (M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston, & M. Young, 1995). Several cues must be present to produce a difference between opaque and transparent surfaces that is adequate to guide attention.
一系列七个实验探究了在透明干扰物中搜索不透明目标,或者反之在不透明干扰物中搜索透明目标的情况。静态刺激产生的搜索效率极低。对于移动的物体,在透明干扰物中搜索不透明目标相当高效,而搜索透明目标的效率则较低(实验1)。透明和不透明物体在运动线索、亮度线索和图形线索(例如连接类型)方面存在差异。运动线索不足以支持高效搜索(实验2 - 5)。违反透明度的亮度规则会干扰搜索(实验3和4)。实验5表明,如果去除X形连接,搜索效率就会变低。实验6和7表明,如果X形连接被遮挡,高效搜索仍能进行。看来,将注意力导向不透明目标的引导是基于“线索组合”(M. S. 兰迪、L. T. 马洛尼、E. B. 约翰斯顿和M. 杨,1995)。必须存在多个线索,才能在不透明和透明表面之间产生足以引导注意力的差异。