• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

注意力对价值整合的影响。

The influence of attention on value integration.

作者信息

Kunar Melina A, Watson Derrick G, Tsetsos Konstantinos, Chater Nick

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1615-1627. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1340-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-017-1340-7
PMID:28547680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5515995/
Abstract

People often have to make decisions based on many pieces of information. Previous work has found that people are able to integrate values presented in a rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream to make informed judgements on the overall stream value (Tsetsos et al. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(24), 9659-9664, 2012). It is also well known that attentional mechanisms influence how people process information. However, it is unknown how attentional factors impact value judgements of integrated material. The current study is the first of its kind to investigate whether value judgements are influenced by attentional processes when assimilating information. Experiments 1-3 examined whether the attentional salience of an item within an RSVP stream affected judgements of overall stream value. The results showed that the presence of an irrelevant high or low value salient item biased people to judge the stream as having a higher or lower overall mean value, respectively. Experiments 4-7 directly tested Tsetsos et al.'s (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(24), 9659-9664, 2012) theory examining whether extreme values in an RSVP stream become over-weighted, thereby capturing attention more than other values in the stream. The results showed that the presence of both a high (Experiments 4, 6 and 7) and a low (Experiment 5) value outlier captures attention leading to less accurate report of subsequent items in the stream. Taken together, the results showed that valuations can be influenced by attentional processes, and can lead to less accurate subjective judgements.

摘要

人们常常不得不基于许多信息片段来做出决策。先前的研究发现,人们能够整合快速序列视觉呈现(RSVP)流中呈现的值,以便对整体流价值做出明智的判断(Tsetsos等人,《美国国家科学院院刊》,109(24),9659 - 9664,2012年)。众所周知,注意力机制会影响人们处理信息的方式。然而,注意力因素如何影响整合材料的价值判断尚不清楚。当前的研究是同类研究中的首个,旨在调查在吸收信息时价值判断是否受注意力过程的影响。实验1 - 3检验了RSVP流中一个项目的注意力显著性是否会影响对整体流价值的判断。结果表明,一个无关的高价值或低价值显著项目的存在,会分别使人们倾向于将该流判断为具有更高或更低的整体平均值。实验4 - 7直接检验了Tsetsos等人(《美国国家科学院院刊》,109(24),9659 - 9664,2012年)的理论,即检验RSVP流中的极值是否会被过度加权,从而比流中的其他值更能吸引注意力。结果表明,一个高价值(实验4、6和7)和一个低价值(实验5)异常值的存在都会吸引注意力,导致对流中后续项目的报告准确性降低。综合来看,结果表明估值会受到注意力过程的影响,并可能导致不太准确的主观判断。

相似文献

1
The influence of attention on value integration.注意力对价值整合的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Aug;79(6):1615-1627. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1340-7.
2
Long-lasting effects of briefly flashed words and pseudowords in ultrarapid serial visual presentation.超快速序列视觉呈现中短暂闪烁单词和伪词的持久效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2010 Sep;36(5):1339-45. doi: 10.1037/a0019999.
3
Making decisions about time: event-related potentials and judgements about the equality of durations.关于时间的决策:与事件相关的电位和对持续时间相等的判断。
Biol Psychol. 2011 Sep;88(1):94-103. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.06.013. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
4
The role of depth of encoding in attentional capture.编码深度在注意捕获中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1424-9. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0807-6.
5
Attentional capture and engagement during the attentional blink: A "camera" metaphor of attention.注意瞬脱期间的注意捕获与参与:一种关于注意的“相机”隐喻
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Nov;42(11):1886-1902. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000286. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
6
Effect of emotions on temporal attention.情绪对时间注意力的影响。
Prog Brain Res. 2017;236:287-309. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink.大细胞和小细胞通路在注意瞬脱中的作用。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Oct;68(1):42-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.02.119. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
9
Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.基于价值的注意捕获会影响情境依赖的决策。
J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jul;114(1):560-9. doi: 10.1152/jn.00343.2015. Epub 2015 May 20.
10
Implicit Neurofeedback Training of Feature-Based Attention Promotes Biased Sensory Processing during Integrative Decision-Making.基于特征的注意的内隐神经反馈训练促进了综合决策过程中的偏向性感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 29;41(39):8233-8248. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0243-21.2021. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion-Guided Attention Impacts Deliberate Multi-Evidence Emotion-Related Perceptual Decision-Making.情绪引导的注意力影响刻意的多证据情绪相关知觉决策。
Psychophysiology. 2025 May;62(5):e70059. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70059.
2
Effects of machine learning errors on human decision-making: manipulations of model accuracy, error types, and error importance.机器学习错误对人类决策的影响:模型精度、错误类型和错误重要性的操纵。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00586-2.
3
Expecting to integrate additional information improves averaging of experience.

本文引用的文献

1
Five Factors that Guide Attention in Visual Search.视觉搜索中引导注意力的五个因素。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Mar;1(3). doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0058. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
The downside of choice: Having a choice benefits enjoyment, but at a cost to efficiency and time in visual search.选择的弊端:拥有选择有利于提升愉悦感,但在视觉搜索中会以效率和时间为代价。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Apr;78(3):736-41. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1062-2.
3
Economic choices reveal probability distortion in macaque monkeys.经济选择揭示了猕猴的概率扭曲。
期望整合额外的信息可以提高经验的平均水平。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16627. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67369-z.
4
The Future of Decisions From Experience: Connecting Real-World Decision Problems to Cognitive Processes.经验决策的未来:将现实世界的决策问题与认知过程联系起来。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):82-102. doi: 10.1177/17456916231179138. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
5
EEG-representational geometries and psychometric distortions in approximate numerical judgment.在近似数值判断中,脑电图表现的几何形状和心理测量扭曲。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Dec 5;18(12):e1010747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010747. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
The optimal use of computer aided detection to find low prevalence cancers.利用计算机辅助检测寻找低患病率癌症的最佳方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00361-1.
7
How top-down and bottom-up attention modulate risky choice.自上而下和自下而上的注意力如何调节风险选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 28;118(39). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025646118.
8
Salience effects in information acquisition: No evidence for a top-down coherence influence.信息获取中的突显效应:无自上而下连贯影响的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Nov;49(8):1537-1554. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01188-9. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Urgency Promotes Affective Disengagement: Effects From Bivalent Cues on Preference Formation for Abstract Images.紧迫感促进情感脱离:二价线索对抽象图像偏好形成的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 23;11:1404. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01404. eCollection 2020.
10
Dissociable mechanisms govern when and how strongly reward attributes affect decisions.分离的机制决定了奖励属性何时以及以何种强度影响决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Sep;4(9):949-963. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0893-y. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;35(7):3146-54. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-14.2015.
4
Do humans make good decisions?人类能做出正确的决策吗?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2015 Jan;19(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
5
The subtlety of distinctiveness: What von Restorff really did.独特性的微妙之处:冯·雷斯托夫真正做了什么。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Mar;2(1):105-12. doi: 10.3758/BF03214414.
6
A configural dominant account of contextual cueing: Configural cues are stronger than colour cues.情境线索的构型主导解释:构型线索比颜色线索更强。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(7):1366-82. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.863373. Epub 2013 Dec 9.
7
Simultaneous modeling of visual saliency and value computation improves predictions of economic choice.同时建模视觉显著性和价值计算可提高经济选择的预测。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 1;110(40):E3858-67. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304429110. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
8
When are abrupt onsets found efficiently in complex visual search? Evidence from multielement asynchronous dynamic search.在复杂视觉搜索中何时能高效发现突然出现的目标?来自多元素异步动态搜索的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):232-52. doi: 10.1037/a0033544. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
9
Negative emotional stimuli reduce contextual cueing but not response times in inefficient search.负面情绪刺激会降低情境线索化效应,但不会影响低效搜索中的反应时间。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Feb;67(2):377-93. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2013.815236. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
10
Age-related associative deficits and the isolation effect.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2013;20(4):405-28. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2012.725460. Epub 2012 Sep 26.