Hesselson A B, Parsonnet V, Bernstein A D, Bonavita G J
Pacemaker Center, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center, New Jersey 07112.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Jun;19(7):1542-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90616-u.
Nine hundred fifty patients who received three modes of primary pacemaker systems (581 dual-chamber universal [DDD], 84 atrioventricular-sequential ventricular-inhibited [DVI] and 285 ventricular-inhibited [VVI]) over 12 years were studied retrospectively to determine the effect of pacing mode on patient longevity and the subsequent development of chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter. All patients were followed up continuously for 7 to 8 years. Patients were classified according to indication for permanent pacing (sick sinus syndrome or other indication), age at pacemaker implantation (less than or equal to 70 or greater than 70 years) and history of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Fourteen percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation at some time during the study period. Of those, 4% had a DDD pacemaker, 8% had a DVI pacemaker and 19% had a VVI pacemaker. At 7 years, atrial fibrillation was significantly more frequent in the VVI group than in the DDD and DVI groups. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, the incidence rate was even higher in the VVI group but approximately the same in the DDD and DVI groups. Patients in the VVI and DVI groups who had had previous atrial tachyarrhythmia had a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation at 7 years than did those in the DDD group. During the entire period there were 130 deaths in the study group, including 22% of patients with a DDD pacemaker, 38% of those with a DVI pacemaker and 50% of those with a VVI pacemaker. Patient survival at 7 years was lower in the VVI group than in the DDD or DVI groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
对950例在12年期间接受三种主要起搏器系统模式(581例双腔通用型[DDD]、84例房室顺序心室抑制型[DVI]和285例心室抑制型[VVI])的患者进行了回顾性研究,以确定起搏模式对患者寿命以及随后慢性房颤或房扑发生的影响。所有患者均连续随访7至8年。患者根据永久起搏指征(病态窦房结综合征或其他指征)、起搏器植入时的年龄(小于或等于70岁或大于70岁)以及房性快速心律失常病史进行分类。在研究期间,14%的患者在某个时间发生了房颤。其中,4%拥有DDD起搏器,8%拥有DVI起搏器,19%拥有VVI起搏器。在7年时,VVI组房颤的发生率显著高于DDD组和DVI组。在病态窦房结综合征患者中,VVI组的发生率更高,但DDD组和DVI组大致相同。VVI组和DVI组中既往有房性快速心律失常的患者在7年时房颤的发生率显著高于DDD组。在整个研究期间,研究组有130例死亡,其中拥有DDD起搏器的患者占22%,拥有DVI起搏器的患者占38%,拥有VVI起搏器的患者占50%。VVI组7年时的患者生存率低于DDD组或DVI组。(摘要截断于250字)