Suppr超能文献

在混合性颈动脉窦综合征中,双腔起搏(DDD)是否优于心室按需起搏(VVI)?一项急性和中期研究。

Is DDD superior to VVI pacing in mixed carotid sinus syndrome? An acute and medium-term study.

作者信息

Brignole M, Sartore B, Barra M, Menozzi C, Lolli G

机构信息

Laboratory of Electrophysiology and Pacemaker Implant, Service of Cardiology, Hospital of Lavagna, Italy.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1902-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06327.x.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the importance of atrial synchronism for pacing therapy of patients with mixed carotid sinus syndrome. In 23 patients (21 m, two f; mean age 69 +/- 8 years) affected by symptomatic mixed carotid sinus syndrome we performed: (1) Research of ventriculo-atrial conduction, orthostatic hypotension and pacemaker effect; and (2) Carotid sinus massage in the standing position during VVI and DVI temporary pacing. Next, all patients received a permanent DDD pacemaker and entered a 2 month two period single-blind, randomized, cross-over study on DVI/DDD versus VVI mode. During the DVI/DDD period, no syncope occurred in any patients, minor symptoms persisted in 11 (48%) of them; during VVI period syncopes recurred in three patients, symptoms requiring the withdrawal of VVI pacing and premature DVI/DDD reprogramming in eight patients, minor symptoms in 17 (74%). A comparison between 14 patients, who preferred DVI/DDD period (Group A), and the remaining nine patients who noted no preference between DVI/DDD and VVI period (Group B) was performed on the basis of the preimplant evaluation. Group A patients had a greater pacemaker effect (-34 +/- 16 mmHg vs -16 +/- 14 mmHg) and a higher prevalence of symptomatic pacemaker effect (50% vs 0%), of ventriculo-atrial conduction (78% vs 44%) and of orthostatic hypotension (50% vs 11%), while the entity of the systolic pressure fall caused by carotid sinus massage was similar in the two groups either during VVI mode (Group A -51 +/- 16 mmHg vs Group B -56 +/- 27 mmHg) or DVI mode (Group A -38 +/- 17 mmHg vs Group B -45 +/- 17 mmHg).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究的目的是评估心房同步性在混合型颈动脉窦综合征患者起搏治疗中的重要性。在23例有症状的混合型颈动脉窦综合征患者(21例男性,2例女性;平均年龄69±8岁)中,我们进行了:(1)研究心室-心房传导、体位性低血压和起搏器效应;(2)在VVI和DVI临时起搏期间于站立位进行颈动脉窦按摩。接下来,所有患者均植入永久性DDD起搏器,并进入一项为期2个月的双期单盲、随机、交叉研究,比较DVI/DDD与VVI模式。在DVI/DDD期,所有患者均未发生晕厥,11例(48%)仍有轻微症状;在VVI期,3例患者再次发生晕厥,8例患者因症状需要停用VVI起搏并提前重新程控为DVI/DDD,17例(74%)有轻微症状。根据植入前评估,对14例更喜欢DVI/DDD期的患者(A组)和其余9例在DVI/DDD期与VVI期无偏好的患者(B组)进行了比较。A组患者的起搏器效应更大(-34±16 mmHg对-16±14 mmHg),有症状的起搏器效应、心室-心房传导和体位性低血压的患病率更高(分别为50%对0%、78%对44%、50%对11%),而在VVI模式(A组-51±16 mmHg对B组-56±27 mmHg)或DVI模式(A组-38±17 mmHg对B组-45±17 mmHg)下,两组由颈动脉窦按摩引起的收缩压下降幅度相似。(摘要截选至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验