Nguyen Kaylin T, Vittinghoff Eric, Dewland Thomas A, Dukes Jonathan W, Soliman Elsayed Z, Stein Phyllis K, Gottdiener John S, Alonso Alvaro, Chen Lin Y, Psaty Bruce M, Heckbert Susan R, Marcus Gregory M
Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Aug 3;6(8):e006028. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006028.
Atrial fibrillation and heart failure are 2 of the most common diseases, yet ready means to identify individuals at risk are lacking. The 12-lead ECG is one of the most accessible tests in medicine. Our objective was to determine whether a premature atrial contraction observed on a standard 12-lead ECG would predict atrial fibrillation and mortality and whether a premature ventricular contraction would predict heart failure and mortality.
We utilized the CHS (Cardiovascular Health) Study, which followed 5577 participants for a median of 12 years, as the primary cohort. The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study), the replication cohort, captured data from 15 792 participants over a median of 22 years. In the CHS, multivariable analyses revealed that a baseline 12-lead ECG premature atrial contraction predicted a 60% increased risk of atrial fibrillation (hazard ratio, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0; <0.001) and a premature ventricular contraction predicted a 30% increased risk of heart failure (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; =0.021). In the negative control analyses, neither predicted incident myocardial infarction. A premature atrial contraction was associated with a 30% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5; =0.008) and a premature ventricular contraction was associated with a 20% increased risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.0-1.3; =0.044). Similarly statistically significant results for each analysis were also observed in ARIC.
Based on a single standard ECG, a premature atrial contraction predicted incident atrial fibrillation and death and a premature ventricular contraction predicted incident heart failure and death, suggesting that this commonly used test may predict future disease.
心房颤动和心力衰竭是两种最常见的疾病,但目前仍缺乏识别高危个体的有效方法。12导联心电图是医学上最常用的检查之一。我们的目的是确定在标准12导联心电图上观察到的房性早搏是否能预测心房颤动和死亡率,以及室性早搏是否能预测心力衰竭和死亡率。
我们将心血管健康研究(CHS)作为主要队列,该研究对5577名参与者进行了为期12年的随访。复制队列社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究(ARIC)收集了15792名参与者平均22年的数据。在CHS中,多变量分析显示,基线12导联心电图房性早搏预测心房颤动风险增加60%(风险比,1.6;95%可信区间,1.3-2.0;P<0.001),室性早搏预测心力衰竭风险增加30%(风险比,1.3;95%可信区间,1.0-1.6;P=0.021)。在阴性对照分析中,两者均不能预测心肌梗死的发生。房性早搏与死亡风险增加30%相关(风险比,1.3;95%可信区间,1.1-1.5;P=0.008),室性早搏与死亡风险增加20%相关(风险比,1.2;95%可信区间,1.0-1.3;P=0.044)。在ARIC中也观察到了每项分析具有相似统计学意义的结果。
基于单次标准心电图,房性早搏可预测心房颤动的发生和死亡,室性早搏可预测心力衰竭的发生和死亡,这表明这项常用检查可能有助于预测未来疾病。