• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不进行局部麻醉的体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis.

作者信息

Pettrone Frank A, McCall Brian R

机构信息

Commonwealth Orthopaedics, 1635 North George Mason Drive, Suite 310, Arlington, VA 22205, USA.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01356.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.C.01356
PMID:15930540
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis is controversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia to treat chronic lateral epicondylitis.

METHODS

One hundred and fourteen patients with a minimum six-month history of lateral epicondylitis that was unresponsive to conventional therapy were randomized into double-blind active treatment and placebo groups. The protocol consisted of three weekly treatments of either low-dose shock wave therapy without anesthetic or a sham treatment. Patients had a physical examination, including provocation testing and dynamometry, at one, four, eight, and twelve weeks and at six and twelve months after treatment. Radiographs, laboratory studies, and electrocardiograms were also evaluated prior to participation and at twelve weeks. A visual analog scale was used to evaluate pain, and an upper extremity functional scale was used to assess function. Crossover to active treatment was initiated for nonresponsive patients who had received the placebo and met the inclusion criteria after twelve weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 108 of the 114 randomized patients completed all treatments and the twelve weeks of follow-up required by the protocol. Sixty-one patients completed one year of follow-up, whereas thirty-four patients crossed over to receive active treatment. A significant difference (p = 0.001) in pain reduction was observed at twelve weeks in the intent-to-treat cohort, with an improvement in the pain score of at least 50% seen in 61% (thirty-four) of the fifty-six patients in the active treatment group who were treated according to protocol compared with 29% (seventeen) of the fifty-eight subjects in the placebo group. This improvement persisted in those followed to one year. Functional activity scores, activity-specific evaluation, and the overall impression of the disease state all showed significant improvement as well (p < 0.05). Crossover patients also showed significant improvement after twelve weeks of active treatment, with 56% (nineteen of thirty-four) achieving an improvement in the pain score of at least 50% (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that low-dose shock wave therapy without anesthetic is a safe and effective treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis.

摘要

背景

体外冲击波疗法用于治疗外侧上髁炎存在争议。本研究的目的是评估在不进行局部麻醉的情况下使用体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的效果。

方法

114例患有至少6个月外侧上髁炎病史且对传统治疗无反应的患者被随机分为双盲主动治疗组和安慰剂组。方案包括每周进行3次治疗,治疗方式为无麻醉的低剂量冲击波疗法或假治疗。患者在治疗后1周、4周、8周、12周以及6个月和12个月时接受体格检查,包括激发试验和握力测试。在参与研究前和12周时还对X光片、实验室检查和心电图进行评估。使用视觉模拟量表评估疼痛情况,使用上肢功能量表评估功能。对于接受安慰剂治疗且在12周后符合纳入标准的无反应患者,开始交叉接受主动治疗。

结果

114例随机分组的患者中,共有108例完成了所有治疗以及方案要求的12周随访。61例患者完成了1年的随访,而34例患者交叉接受了主动治疗。在意向性治疗队列中,12周时观察到疼痛减轻存在显著差异(p = 0.001),按照方案接受治疗的主动治疗组56例患者中有61%(34例)疼痛评分改善至少50%,而安慰剂组58例受试者中这一比例为29%(17例)。这种改善在随访至1年的患者中持续存在。功能活动评分、特定活动评估以及疾病状态的总体印象也均显示出显著改善(p < 0.05)。交叉患者在接受12周主动治疗后也显示出显著改善,56%(34例中的19例)疼痛评分改善至少50%(p < 0.0001)。

结论

这些结果表明,无麻醉的低剂量冲击波疗法是治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的一种安全有效的方法。

相似文献

1
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy without local anesthesia for chronic lateral epicondylitis.不进行局部麻醉的体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Jun;87(6):1297-304. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.C.01356.
2
Effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of previously untreated lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗初发性外侧肱骨髁炎的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Oct-Nov;32(7):1660-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546503262806.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis--a double blind randomised controlled trial.体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎——一项双盲随机对照试验
J Orthop Res. 2002 Sep;20(5):895-8. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00013-X.
4
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis : a randomized multicenter trial.体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎:一项随机多中心试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Nov;84(11):1982-91. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200211000-00012.
5
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Is Not More Effective Than Placebo in the Management of Lateral Epicondylitis: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.桡侧体外冲击波疗法治疗肱骨外上髁炎并不比安慰剂更有效:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Jul;95(7):495-506. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000407.
6
Safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for chronic lateral epicondylitis.体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性外侧上髁炎的安全性和有效性。
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2005 Jan;34(1):13-9; discussion 19.
7
A randomized controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).体外冲击波治疗外侧上髁炎(网球肘)的随机对照试验
J Rheumatol. 2008 Oct;35(10):2038-46. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
8
Repetitive low-energy shock wave treatment for chronic lateral epicondylitis in tennis players.重复性低能量冲击波治疗网球运动员慢性外侧肱骨髁炎
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):734-43. doi: 10.1177/0363546503261697.
9
Clinically relevant effectiveness of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: a randomized, controlled multicenter study.聚焦式体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性足底筋膜炎的临床相关疗效:一项随机对照多中心研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):701-8. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01331.
10
Shock wave therapy for patients with lateral epicondylitis of the elbow: a one- to two-year follow-up study.肘部外侧上髁炎患者的冲击波治疗:一项1至2年的随访研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2002 May-Jun;30(3):422-5. doi: 10.1177/03635465020300031901.

引用本文的文献

1
Heavy slow resistance training, radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy or advice for patients with tennis elbow in the Norwegian secondary care: a randomised controlled feasibility trial.挪威二级医疗中针对网球肘患者的重度慢速阻力训练、径向体外冲击波疗法或建议:一项随机对照可行性试验
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e085916. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085916.
2
Comparing the long-term effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and therapeutic ultrasound in treating trigger finger: A prospective cohort study.比较体外冲击波疗法和治疗性超声治疗扳机指的长期效果:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Saudi Med J. 2025 Jan;46(1):36-42. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.1.20240612.
3
Comparison of high intensity laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave in treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a randomized controlled study.
高强度激光治疗与体外冲击波治疗肱骨外上髁炎的比较:一项随机对照研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Nov 8;39(1):270. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04222-9.
4
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Local Corticosteroid Injection for Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.体外冲击波疗法与局部皮质类固醇注射治疗慢性肱骨外上髁炎的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2598-2607. doi: 10.1111/os.14212. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
5
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for upper limb tendonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.体外冲击波疗法治疗上肢肌腱炎的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 30;11:1394268. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1394268. eCollection 2024.
6
Comparison of local massage, steroid injection, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy efficacy in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis.比较局部按摩、皮质类固醇注射和体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肱骨上髁炎的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Apr 26;35(2):386-395. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1648.
7
Feasibility Using Telehealth for Planning Use of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in a Sports Medicine Clinic.在运动医学诊所利用远程医疗规划体外冲击波治疗的可行性
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 27;11(11):1574. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11111574.
8
Radial or Focal Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Real-Life Retrospective Study.桡侧或焦点体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧肘肌腱病:真实世界回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054371.
9
Analgesic Effect of Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy in Individuals with Lateral Epicondylitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.体外冲击波疗法对肱骨外上髁炎患者的镇痛效果:一项随机对照试验
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Mar 18;7(1):29. doi: 10.3390/jfmk7010029.
10
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Lateral Epicondylitis, Lonely or in Combination with Topical Corticosteroid; Which Approach is Superior?体外冲击波疗法治疗外侧上髁炎,单独使用或联合外用皮质类固醇;哪种方法更优?
Galen Med J. 2020 Jul 1;9:e1791. doi: 10.31661/gmj.v9i0.1791. eCollection 2020.