Department of Scientific Research, Campus Ludes, Off-Campus Semmelweis University, 6912 Lugano, Switzerland.
Antalgic Mini-Invasive and Rehab-Outpatients Unit, Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University "G. d'Annunzio", 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4371. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054371.
Lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET) is characterized by pain, poor muscle strength of the wrist ex-tensors, and disability. Among the conservative rehabilitative approaches, focal as well as radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), are considered effective in LET management. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of focal (fESWT) and radial (rESWT) in terms of LET symptoms and the strength of wrist extensors, taking into account potential gender differences. This is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of patients with LET treated with ESWT that had received a clinical and functional evaluation, including visuo-analogic scale (VAS), muscle strength using an electronic dynamometer during Cozen's test, and the patient-rated tennis elbow evaluation (PRTEE) questionnaire. Follow-ups were carried out weekly in four visits after enrollment, and at 8 and 12 weeks. During the follow-ups, the VAS score decreased in both treatments, even if patients receiving fESWT reported early pain relief compared to those treated with rESWT (time for treatment -value < 0.001). Additionally, peak muscle strength increased independently of the device used, and again more rapidly in the fESWT group (time for treatment -value < 0.001). In the stratified analysis for sex and for the type of ESWT, rESWT appears to be less effective in female participants in terms of mean muscle strength and PRTEE scores, without differences according to the type of device used. The rESWT group reported a higher rate of minor adverse events (i.e., discomfort, = 0.03) compared to fESWT. Our data suggest that both fESWT and rESWT might be effective in improving LET symptoms, even if the higher rate of painful procedures were reported in patients treated with rESWT.
外侧肘肌腱病(LET)的特征是疼痛、手腕伸肌力量差和活动障碍。在保守的康复治疗方法中,焦点和径向体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)被认为对 LET 的管理有效。本研究的目的是比较焦点(fESWT)和径向(rESWT)在 LET 症状和手腕伸肌力量方面的安全性和有效性,同时考虑到潜在的性别差异。这是一项回顾性纵向队列研究,纳入了接受 ESWT 治疗的 LET 患者,这些患者接受了临床和功能评估,包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)、在 Cozen 测试中使用电子测力计测量肌肉力量以及患者网球肘评估(PRTEE)问卷。在纳入后的四个随访中每周进行一次随访,并在 8 周和 12 周时进行随访。在随访期间,两种治疗方法的 VAS 评分均下降,尽管接受 fESWT 的患者报告的早期疼痛缓解程度高于接受 rESWT 的患者(治疗时间-值<0.001)。此外,峰值肌肉力量增加独立于所使用的设备,并且在 fESWT 组中增加更快(治疗时间-值<0.001)。在性别和 ESWT 类型的分层分析中,rESWT 似乎对女性参与者的平均肌肉力量和 PRTEE 评分的效果较差,而与所使用的设备类型无关。rESWT 组报告的轻微不良事件(即不适)发生率高于 fESWT 组(=0.03)。我们的数据表明,fESWT 和 rESWT 都可能有效改善 LET 症状,尽管 rESWT 治疗的患者报告了更高的疼痛程序发生率。