Suppr超能文献

一个高可靠性医疗保健组织兴衰的案例。

A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organisation.

作者信息

Roberts K H, Madsen P, Desai V, Van Stralen D

机构信息

Walter A Haas School of Business, 545 Student Services Building, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):216-20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009589.

Abstract

High reliability organisations (HROs) are those in which errors rarely occur. To accomplish this they conduct relatively error free operations over long periods of time and make consistently good decisions resulting in high quality and reliability. Some organisational processes that characterise HROs are process auditing, implementing appropriate reward systems, avoiding quality degradation, appropriately perceiving that risk exists and developing strategies to deal with it, and command and control. Command and control processes include migrating decision making, redundancy in people or hardware, developing situational awareness, formal rules and procedures, and training. These processes must be tailored to the specific organisation implementing them. These processes were applied to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) where care was derived from problem solving methodology rather than protocol. After a leadership change, the unit returned to the hierarchical medical model of care. Important outcome variables such as infant mortality, patient return to the PICU after discharge, days on the PICU, air transports, degraded. Implications for clinical practice include providing caregivers with sufficient flexibility to meet changing situations, encouraging teamwork, and avoiding shaming, naming, and blaming.

摘要

高可靠性组织(HROs)是那些很少出现错误的组织。为实现这一点,它们在很长一段时间内进行相对无差错的运营,并始终做出良好决策,从而实现高质量和可靠性。一些体现高可靠性组织特征的组织流程包括流程审计、实施适当的奖励系统、避免质量下降、正确认识到风险的存在并制定应对策略,以及指挥与控制。指挥与控制流程包括转移决策制定、人员或硬件冗余、培养态势感知、制定正式规则和程序以及培训。这些流程必须根据实施它们的特定组织进行调整。这些流程被应用于一个儿科重症监护病房(PICU),该病房的护理源自问题解决方法而非协议。在领导层变更后,该病房又回到了分层医疗护理模式。一些重要的结果变量,如婴儿死亡率、出院后患者返回PICU的情况、在PICU的天数、空中转运等都变差了。对临床实践的启示包括为护理人员提供足够的灵活性以应对不断变化的情况、鼓励团队合作,以及避免羞辱、点名和指责。

相似文献

1
A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organisation.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):216-20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009589.
5
Six ways to zero defects.
Nurs Manage. 2009 Sep;40(9):35-40; quiz 40-1. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000360771.59729.06.
6
How safe is my intensive care unit? An overview of error causation and prevention.
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2007 Dec;13(6):697-702. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f12cc8.
7
Patient safety: what is really at issue?
Front Health Serv Manage. 2005 Fall;22(1):3-16.
8
Clinical decision support systems in the pediatric intensive care unit.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;10(1):23-8. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181936b23.
9
Nursing home safety: a review of the literature.
Annu Rev Nurs Res. 2006;24:179-215.
10
The role for leaders of health care organizations in patient safety.
Am J Med Qual. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):311-8. doi: 10.1177/1062860607304743.

引用本文的文献

2
Mindful organizing in patients' contributions to primary care medication safety.
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):964-972. doi: 10.1111/hex.12689. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Interprofessional team management in pediatric critical care: some challenges and possible solutions.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Feb 24;9:47-58. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S76773. eCollection 2016.
5
Huddling for high reliability and situation awareness.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Nov;22(11):899-906. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001467. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
6
[Patient safety in anesthesiology and intensive care medicine. Measures for improvement].
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013 Nov;108(8):657-65. doi: 10.1007/s00063-012-0182-2. Epub 2012 Nov 7.
9
Improving patient safety in hospitals: Contributions of high-reliability theory and normal accident theory.
Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug;41(4 Pt 2):1654-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00570.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验