• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量体系的结构对过程和结果很重要,瑞典386个医院科室的实证研究。

The structure of quality systems is important to the process and outcome, an empirical study of 386 hospital departments in Sweden.

作者信息

Kunkel Stefan, Rosenqvist Urban, Westerling Ragnar

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 9;7:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-104.

DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-7-104
PMID:17620113
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1959199/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicians, nurses, and managers in hospitals are continuously confronted by new technologies and methods that require changes to working practice. Quality systems can help to manage change while maintaining a high quality of care. A new model of quality systems inspired by the works of Donabedian has three factors: structure (resources and administration), process (culture and professional co-operation), and outcome (competence development and goal achievement). The objectives of this study were to analyse whether structure, process, and outcome can be used to describe quality systems, to analyse whether these components are related, and to discuss implications.

METHODS

A questionnaire was developed and sent to a random sample of 600 hospital departments in Sweden. The adjusted response rate was 75%. The data were analysed with confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling in LISREL. This is to our knowledge the first large quantitative study that applies Donabedian's model to quality systems.

RESULTS

The model with relationships between structure, process, and outcome was found to be a reasonable representation of quality systems at hospital departments (p = 0.095, indicating no significant differences between the model and the data set). Structure correlated strongly with process (0.72) and outcome (0.60). Given structure, process also correlated with outcome (0.20).

CONCLUSION

The model could be used to describe and evaluate single quality systems or to compare different quality systems. It could also be an aid to implement a systematic and evidence-based system for working with quality improvements in hospital departments.

摘要

背景

医院的临床医生、护士和管理人员不断面临需要改变工作实践的新技术和方法。质量体系有助于在维持高质量护理的同时管理变革。受唐纳贝迪安著作启发的一种新的质量体系模型有三个要素:结构(资源与管理)、过程(文化与专业合作)和结果(能力发展与目标达成)。本研究的目的是分析结构、过程和结果是否可用于描述质量体系,分析这些组成部分是否相关,并探讨其意义。

方法

设计了一份问卷,并发送给瑞典600个医院科室的随机样本。调整后的回复率为75%。使用LISREL软件中的验证性因素分析和结构方程模型对数据进行分析。据我们所知,这是第一项将唐纳贝迪安模型应用于质量体系的大型定量研究。

结果

发现具有结构、过程和结果之间关系的模型是医院科室质量体系的合理代表(p = 0.095,表明模型与数据集之间无显著差异)。结构与过程(0.72)和结果(0.60)密切相关。给定结构后,过程也与结果相关(0.20)。

结论

该模型可用于描述和评估单个质量体系或比较不同的质量体系。它也有助于在医院科室实施一个用于质量改进工作的系统且基于证据的体系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f75/1959199/f419458871a3/1472-6963-7-104-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f75/1959199/def66fe8093b/1472-6963-7-104-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f75/1959199/f419458871a3/1472-6963-7-104-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f75/1959199/def66fe8093b/1472-6963-7-104-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f75/1959199/f419458871a3/1472-6963-7-104-2.jpg

相似文献

1
The structure of quality systems is important to the process and outcome, an empirical study of 386 hospital departments in Sweden.质量体系的结构对过程和结果很重要,瑞典386个医院科室的实证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jul 9;7:104. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-104.
2
Implementation strategies influence the structure, process and outcome of quality systems: an empirical study of hospital departments in Sweden.实施策略影响质量体系的结构、过程和结果:瑞典医院科室的实证研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):49-54. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.023978.
3
Quality improvement designs are related to the degree of organisation of quality systems: an empirical study of hospital departments.
Health Policy. 2007 Dec;84(2-3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
4
Original research: nurse-physician relationships: impact on nurse satisfaction and retention.原创研究:护士与医生的关系:对护士满意度和留职率的影响
Am J Nurs. 2002 Jun;102(6):26-34. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200206000-00040.
5
Quality of nosocomial infection control in Thailand.泰国医院感染控制的质量。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Dec;88 Suppl 10:S145-9.
6
Patient safety climate in 92 US hospitals: differences by work area and discipline.美国92家医院的患者安全氛围:按工作领域和学科划分的差异
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):23-31. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817e189d.
7
Surveying improvement activities in health care on a national level--the Swedish internal collaborative strategy and its challenges.
Qual Manag Health Care. 2003 Oct-Dec;12(4):202-16. doi: 10.1097/00019514-200310000-00005.
8
Institutionalization of quality improvement programs in Korean hospitals.韩国医院质量改进项目的制度化
Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Oct;12(5):419-23. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/12.5.419.
9
Doctors experiences on the quality of care for pesticide poisoning patients in hospitals in Kampala, Uganda: a qualitative exploration using donabedian's model.乌干达坎帕拉医院医生对农药中毒患者护理质量的体验:应用唐纳比德模式的定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jan 9;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4891-6.
10
Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ), Generic version (Short Form 2006).挪威版安全态度问卷(SAQ)通用版(2006年简版)的心理测量学特性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 22;8:191. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-191.

引用本文的文献

1
Cluster of Speaking-Up Behavior in Clinical Nurses and Its Association With Nursing Organizational Culture, Teamwork, and Working Condition: A Cross-Sectional Study.临床护士主动报告行为集群及其与护理组织文化、团队合作和工作条件的关联:一项横断面研究
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Nov 15;2024:9109428. doi: 10.1155/jonm/9109428. eCollection 2024.
2
The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.中国疾病预防控制中心绩效评估指标体系的构建:德尔菲共识研究。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2024 Jul 23;9(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41256-024-00367-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day.实时患者安全审计:每日提升安全性。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):284-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012542.
2
Different types and aspects of quality systems and their implications. A thematic comparison of seven quality systems at a university hospital.质量体系的不同类型和方面及其影响。某大学医院七个质量体系的主题比较。
Health Policy. 2006 Apr;76(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.004. Epub 2005 Jun 27.
3
A case of the birth and death of a high reliability healthcare organisation.
Multidisciplinary meeting review in nonsmall cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
多学科会议回顾在非小细胞肺癌中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Respir Rev. 2024 May 8;33(172). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0157-2023. Print 2024 Apr 30.
4
Interprofessional staff perspectives on the adoption of or black box technology and simulations to improve patient safety: a multi-methods survey.跨专业工作人员对采用“黑匣子”技术和模拟以提高患者安全的看法:一项多方法调查。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Oct 25;8(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00263-2.
5
A modified Delphi consensus on generic indicators for a low- and middle-income country's quality nursing care measurement.关于中低收入国家优质护理服务测量通用指标的德尔菲共识改良版。
Nurs Open. 2022 Sep;9(5):2397-2408. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1255. Epub 2022 May 26.
6
Impact of the bidirectional relationship between communication and cognitive efficacy on orthopedic patient adherence behavior.沟通和认知效能的双向关系对骨科患者依从行为的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 14;22(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07575-5.
7
Outcome Quality of Inpatient and Day-Clinic Treatment in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry-A Naturalistic Study.儿童和青少年精神病学中住院及日间门诊治疗的结局质量——一项自然主义研究
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 11;8(12):1175. doi: 10.3390/children8121175.
8
Mediation and moderation effects of health system structure and process on the quality of mental health services in Ghana - structural equation modelling.加纳卫生系统结构和过程对精神卫生服务质量的中介和调节作用——结构方程模型。
PLoS One. 2020 May 22;15(5):e0233351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233351. eCollection 2020.
9
A quality-improvement approach to effective trauma team activation.一种提高创伤团队激活效果的质量改进方法。
Can J Surg. 2019 Oct 1;62(5):305-314. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000218.
10
Potential quality indicators for seriously ill home care clients: a cross-sectional analysis using Resident Assessment Instrument for Home Care (RAI-HC) data for Ontario.重病家庭护理客户的潜在质量指标:使用安大略省家庭护理居民评估工具(RAI-HC)数据进行的横断面分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Jan 9;18(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12904-018-0389-y.
一个高可靠性医疗保健组织兴衰的案例。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Jun;14(3):216-20. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2003.009589.
4
Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma.急性医疗护理绩效评估中过程与结果数据的使用及误用:避免机构污名化
Lancet. 2004 Apr 3;363(9415):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15901-1.
5
Designing a quality improvement intervention: a systematic approach.设计质量改进干预措施:一种系统方法。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):215-20. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.3.215.
6
Understanding and responding to adverse events.理解并应对不良事件。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 13;348(11):1051-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr020760.
7
Evaluating implementation of quality management systems in a teaching hospital's clinical departments.评估教学医院临床科室质量管理体系的实施情况。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2003 Feb;15(1):47-55. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/15.1.47.
8
Are audits wasting resources by measuring the wrong things? A survey of methods used to select audit review criteria.审计是否因衡量了错误的事项而在浪费资源?一项关于用于选择审计审查标准的方法的调查。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):24-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.24.
9
Assessment of facilities management process capability: a NHS facilities case study.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2002;15(6-7):277-88. doi: 10.1108/09526860210442047.
10
Quality collaboratives: lessons from research.质量协作:研究经验教训
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):345-51. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.345.