Uyl-de Groot Carin A, Giaccone Giuseppe
Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Curr Opin Oncol. 2005 Jul;17(4):392-6. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000168535.25330.6a.
To review pharmacoeconomic studies in gastrointestinal oncology published after January 2003 and to assess whether the use of the new biologic agents should be restricted by cost considerations.
Chemotherapy is standard treatment for the most common gastrointestinal tumors. New biologic agents have recently been introduced with significant benefit. Given the high cost of these novel agents, the question arises as to whether these drugs should be made available without restrictions. For some drugs, results from economic evaluations are available, showing incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 33 649 and 46 720 Euros. However, for the most expensive new drugs such as bevacizumab and cetuximab no data is available yet. However, it is expected that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be much higher. In our opinion incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 45 000 Euros and 50 000 Euros per quality adjusted life year gained, should be acceptable for gastrointestinal cancer patients. We strongly recommend to authorities to be more willing to reimburse new cancer drugs for patients to benefit and that the pharmaceutical companies will be more prudent in their price setting.
There are many new promising (biologic) agents available for patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The availability of these drugs for patients becomes more and more dependent on economic reasons.
回顾2003年1月以后发表的胃肠道肿瘤药物经济学研究,并评估新型生物制剂的使用是否应受成本因素限制。
化疗是最常见胃肠道肿瘤的标准治疗方法。最近引入的新型生物制剂有显著疗效。鉴于这些新型药物成本高昂,就产生了这些药物是否应不受限制地使用的问题。对于一些药物,有经济评估结果,显示其增量成本效益比在33649至46720欧元之间。然而,对于贝伐单抗和西妥昔单抗等最昂贵的新药,尚无相关数据。不过,预计其增量成本效益比会高得多。我们认为,对于胃肠道癌症患者来说,每获得一个质量调整生命年,增量成本效益比在45000至50000欧元之间应是可以接受的。我们强烈建议当局更愿意为患者报销新型抗癌药物以使患者受益,制药公司在定价时应更加谨慎。
有许多有前景的新型(生物)制剂可供胃肠道癌症患者使用。这些药物能否提供给患者越来越取决于经济因素。