Majnemer Annette, Barr Ronald G
School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery and Pediatrics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Jun;47(6):370-6; discussion 364. doi: 10.1017/s0012162205000733.
This study aimed to determine whether supine sleep-positioned infants have delayed motor skills at age 4 and 6 months, and if delays are associated with decreased exposure to prone position. One 4 and one 6-month-old sample of healthy infants born at term were recruited. Motor assessments included the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale (PDMS) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS). Parents completed an infant behavior diary for 3 consecutive days. Seventy-one 4-month-old infants were assessed (38 males; mean age 4.4 mo, standard deviation [SD] 0.2). Mean motor scores were close to normative standards (AIMS 47.7, SD 19.6; PDMS gross motor quotient [GMQ] 96.3, SD 6.5; PDMS fine motor quotient [FMQ] 99.2, SD 4.8). No infant scored below cut-off values used to identify motor delay. Milestones less likely to be achieved included extended arm support in prone, hands to feet in supine, and sitting with arm support. Exposure to 'tummy time' while awake was correlated with AIMS scores (r = 0.38, p < 0.01). F i fty 6-month-old infants were assessed (21 males; mean age 6.4 mo, SD 0.4). Mean scores were shifted down for all scales, and as much as 1 SD for PDMS (AIMS 44.5, SD 21.6; PDMS GMQ 85.7, SD 7.6; PDMS FMQ 88.9, SD 9.0). Only 22% of 6-month-olds could sit without arm support versus 50% expected in a normative sample. Remarkably, 22% of our sample exhibited gross motor delays (quotient <78). Tummy time (awake) was significantly associated with the AIMS (r = 0.64) and PDMS GMQ (r = 0.55) and FMQ (r = 0.33) quotients, even after adjusting for confounders. Typically developing infants who were sleep-positioned in supine had delayed motor development by age 6 months, and this was significantly associated with limited exposure to awake prone positioning. This has important implications for interpreting motor assessments of infants at risk and for preventing inappropriate referrals.
本研究旨在确定仰卧睡眠姿势的婴儿在4个月和6个月大时是否存在运动技能发育延迟,以及这些延迟是否与俯卧姿势暴露减少有关。招募了一组足月出生的4个月大健康婴儿样本和一组6个月大健康婴儿样本。运动评估包括皮博迪发育运动量表(PDMS)和艾伯塔婴儿运动量表(AIMS)。父母连续3天完成一份婴儿行为日记。对71名4个月大的婴儿进行了评估(38名男性;平均年龄4.4个月,标准差[SD]0.2)。平均运动得分接近正常标准(AIMS为47.7,SD为19.6;PDMS粗大运动商数[GMQ]为96.3,SD为6.5;PDMS精细运动商数[FMQ]为99.2,SD为4.8)。没有婴儿得分低于用于识别运动发育延迟的临界值。不太可能达到的发育里程碑包括俯卧时伸展手臂支撑、仰卧时手触脚以及在有手臂支撑的情况下坐立。清醒时的“趴卧时间”与AIMS得分相关(r = 0.38,p < 0.01)。对50名6个月大的婴儿进行了评估(21名男性;平均年龄6.4个月,SD为0.4)。所有量表的平均得分都有所下降,PDMS量表下降多达1个标准差(AIMS为44.5,SD为21.6;PDMS GMQ为85.7,SD为7.6;PDMS FMQ为88.9,SD为9.0)。在6个月大的婴儿中,只有22%的婴儿能够在没有手臂支撑的情况下坐立,而正常样本中的预期比例为50%。值得注意的是,我们样本中有22%的婴儿表现出粗大运动发育延迟(商数<78)。即使在对混杂因素进行调整之后,清醒时的趴卧时间与AIMS(r = 0.64)、PDMS GMQ(r = 0.55)和FMQ(r = 0.33)商数仍显著相关。通常发育的仰卧睡眠姿势婴儿在6个月大时运动发育延迟,这与清醒时俯卧姿势暴露受限显著相关。这对于解释有风险婴儿的运动评估以及预防不适当的转诊具有重要意义。