De Kegel A, Peersman W, Onderbeke K, Baetens T, Dhooge I, Van Waelvelde H
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy Ghent, Artevelde University College - Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Child Care Health Dev. 2013 Mar;39(2):260-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01384.x. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
The Alberta Infant Motor Scales (AIMS) is a reliable and valid assessment tool to evaluate the motor performance from birth to independent walking. This study aimed to determine whether the Canadian reference values on the AIMS from 1990-1992 are still useful tor Flemish infants, assessed in 2007-2010. Additionally, the association between motor performance and sleep and play positioning will be determined.
A total of 270 Flemish infants between 0 and 18 months, recruited by formal day care services, were assessed with the AIMS by four trained physiotherapists. Information about sleep and play positioning was collected by mean of a questionnaire.
Flemish infants perform significantly lower on the AIMS compared with the reference values (P < 0.001). Especially, infants from the age groups of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and of 15 months showed significantly lower scores. From the information collected by parental questionnaires, the lower motor scores seem to be related to the sleep position, the amount of play time in prone, in supine and in a sitting device. Infants who are exposed often to frequently to prone while awake showed a significant higher motor performance than infants who are exposed less to prone (<6 m: P = 0.002; >6 m: P = 0.013). Infants who are placed often to frequently in a sitting device in the first 6 months of life (P = 0.010) and in supine after 6 months (P = 0.001) performed significantly lower than those who are placed less in it.
Flemish infants recruited by formal day care services, show significantly lower motor scores than the Canadian norm population. New reference values should be established for the AIMS for accurate identification of infants at risk. Prevention of sudden infant death syndrome by promoting supine sleep position should go together with promotion of tummy time when awake and avoiding to spent too much time in sitting devices when awake.
艾伯塔婴儿运动量表(AIMS)是一种可靠且有效的评估工具,用于评估从出生到独立行走阶段的运动表现。本研究旨在确定1990 - 1992年加拿大AIMS的参考值对于2007 - 2010年评估的佛兰芒婴儿是否仍然适用。此外,还将确定运动表现与睡眠及玩耍姿势之间的关联。
通过正规日托服务招募了270名0至18个月的佛兰芒婴儿,由四名经过培训的物理治疗师使用AIMS进行评估。通过问卷调查收集有关睡眠和玩耍姿势的信息。
与参考值相比,佛兰芒婴儿在AIMS上的表现显著更低(P < 0.001)。特别是,4、5、6、7、8、9、10、11、12、13和15个月龄组的婴儿得分显著更低。从家长问卷收集的信息来看,较低的运动得分似乎与睡眠姿势、清醒时俯卧、仰卧和坐在器具中的玩耍时间有关。清醒时经常俯卧的婴儿比俯卧较少的婴儿运动表现显著更高(<6个月:P = 0.002;>6个月:P = 0.013)。在生命的前6个月经常坐在器具中的婴儿(P = 0.010)以及6个月后经常仰卧的婴儿(P = 0.001)的表现明显低于较少处于该姿势的婴儿。
通过正规日托服务招募的佛兰芒婴儿,其运动得分显著低于加拿大正常人群。应为AIMS建立新的参考值,以便准确识别有风险的婴儿。通过推广仰卧睡眠姿势预防婴儿猝死综合征应与促进清醒时的趴卧时间以及避免清醒时在器具中花费过多时间相结合。