Suppr超能文献

牙科光引发剂和光固化装置的摩尔消光系数及光子吸收效率。

Molar extinction coefficients and the photon absorption efficiency of dental photoinitiators and light curing units.

作者信息

Neumann Miguel G, Miranda Walter G, Schmitt Carla C, Rueggeberg Frederick A, Correa Ivo C

机构信息

Instituto de Química de São Carlos, Universidade de São Paulo, Caixa Postal 780, 13560-970 São Carlos SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Dent. 2005 Jul;33(6):525-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.013. Epub 2005 Mar 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The light absorption of dental photoinitiators should correlate with the spectral emission profiles of dental light curing units compared on an equivalent basis. Spectral data of dental photoinitiators and light curing units can be used to define the photon absorption efficiency (PAE) obtained by integrating the product of the absorption and emission spectra in terms of photons. This parameter can be used to identify the best performance for photochemical process with specific photoinitiators.

METHODS

The efficiency of two LED and one QTH lamps were tested comparing their performances with the photoinitiators camphorquinone (CQ); phenylpropanedione (PPD); monoacylphosphine oxide (Lucirin TPO); and bisacylphosphine oxide (Irgacure 819). Absorption and emission spectra of the photoinitiators and the LED (Ultrablue I and Ultrablue IS) and QTH (Optilux 401) LCUs were determined in the 360-550nm range.

RESULTS

CQ exhibited an absorption centered in the blue region and, although the maxima of PPD, MAPO, and BAPO were in the UV-A region, their absorption extended to the visible region. Power output maxima of the LCUs were at 467 (Ultrablue I), 454 (Ultrablue IS) and 493nm (Optilux 401), and the total power densities were 170+/-1, 470+/-4 and 444+/-4mW/cm(2), respectively.

SIGNIFICANCE

The use of the PAE allows a prediction of the most efficient photoinitiator/LCU systems. For similar photoinitiator concentrations, Lucirin and CQ are most efficiently photoinitiated by the QTH unit, whereas the high-power LED device is more efficient for Irgacure. PPD is photoactivated similarly by both LCUs.

摘要

目的

牙科光引发剂的光吸收应与牙科光固化机在同等基础上比较的光谱发射曲线相关。牙科光引发剂和光固化机的光谱数据可用于定义通过积分吸收光谱和发射光谱的光子乘积获得的光子吸收效率(PAE)。该参数可用于确定特定光引发剂光化学过程的最佳性能。

方法

测试了两个发光二极管(LED)灯和一个石英卤钨灯(QTH)的效率,并将它们与光引发剂樟脑醌(CQ)、苯丙二酮(PPD)、单酰基氧化膦(Lucirin TPO)和双酰基氧化膦(Irgacure 819)的性能进行比较。在360 - 550nm范围内测定了光引发剂以及LED(Ultrablue I和Ultrablue IS)和QTH(Optilux 401)光固化机的吸收光谱和发射光谱。

结果

CQ的吸收集中在蓝色区域,虽然PPD、单酰基氧化膦(MAPO)和双酰基氧化膦(BAPO)的最大值在紫外 - A区域,但它们的吸收延伸到了可见光区域。光固化机的功率输出最大值分别在467nm(Ultrablue I)、454nm(Ultrablue IS)和493nm(Optilux 401),总功率密度分别为170±1、470±4和444±4mW/cm²。

意义

使用PAE可以预测最有效的光引发剂/光固化机系统。对于相似的光引发剂浓度,Lucirin和CQ由QTH装置引发光反应的效率最高,而高功率LED装置对Irgacure的引发效率更高。PPD由两种光固化机引发光反应的效果相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验