Tsao Jennie C I, Zeltzer Lonnie K
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2005 Jun;2(2):149-159. doi: 10.1093/ecam/neh092. Epub 2005 Apr 27.
In recent years, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in pediatric populations has increased considerably, especially for chronic conditions such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and cystic fibrosis in which pain may be a significant problem. Despite the growing popularity of CAM approaches for pediatric pain, questions regarding the efficacy of these interventions remain. This review critically evaluates the existing empirical evidence for the efficacy of CAM interventions for pain symptoms in children. CAM modalities that possess a published literature, including controlled trials and/or multiple baseline studies, that focused on either chronic or acute, procedural pain were included in this review. The efficacy of the CAM interventions was evaluated according to the framework developed by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. According to these criteria, only one CAM approach reviewed herein (self-hypnosis/guided imagery/relaxation for recurrent pediatric headache) qualified as an empirically supported therapy (EST), although many may be considered possibly efficacious or promising treatments for pediatric pain. Several methodological limitations of the existing literature on CAM interventions for pain problems in children are highlighted and future avenues for research are outlined.
近年来,补充和替代医学(CAM)在儿科人群中的使用显著增加,尤其是对于癌症、类风湿性关节炎和囊性纤维化等慢性疾病,在这些疾病中疼痛可能是一个重大问题。尽管CAM方法在儿科疼痛治疗中越来越受欢迎,但这些干预措施的疗效问题仍然存在。本综述批判性地评估了现有关于CAM干预对儿童疼痛症状疗效的实证证据。本综述纳入了已发表文献(包括对照试验和/或多项基线研究)中涉及的CAM方式,这些研究聚焦于慢性或急性程序性疼痛。CAM干预措施的疗效根据美国心理学会(APA)第12分会促进和传播心理程序特别工作组制定的框架进行评估。根据这些标准,本文综述的CAM方法中只有一种(用于复发性儿童头痛的自我催眠/引导性意象/放松)符合实证支持疗法(EST)的标准,尽管许多方法可能被认为对儿科疼痛有潜在疗效或有望成为有效治疗方法。本文强调了现有关于CAM干预儿童疼痛问题文献的几个方法学局限性,并概述了未来的研究方向。