• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性随机研究:痔切除术中近程吻合器与结扎速血管闭合系统的对比

Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery.

作者信息

Kraemer Matthias, Parulava Tengis, Roblick Michael, Duschka Lothar, Müller-Lobeck Heinrich

机构信息

Department of General Surgery/Coloproctology, St. Barbara-Klinik, Hamm-Heessen, Germany.

出版信息

Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1517-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0067-z.

DOI:10.1007/s10350-005-0067-z
PMID:15937619
Abstract

PURPOSE

It has been shown that for hemorrhoidal surgery both LigaSure and stapler cause less pain than diathermy or scissor dissection. This study has attempted to establish which of the less painful alternatives proves best in an unselected series of patients with hemorrhoidal disease.

METHODS

Fifty patients were randomized to undergo stapling hemorrhoidopexy or LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy. Parameters investigated were pain (primary parameter), patient satisfaction with treatment, and recovery of personal activity. Other factors investigated were operative result, ease of handling, analgesic requirements, and postoperative course.

RESULTS

Both methods were found to be equivalent in all major aspects analyzed. Postoperative pain scores (P = 0.99), patient satisfaction (P = 1), and self-assessment of activity (P = 0.99) were almost identical in both groups of patients. Significant differences were found in none of the numerous factors investigated.

CONCLUSION

Both methods can be used safely and without major disadvantage for the patient regardless of stage and extent of hemorrhoidal disease.

摘要

目的

已有研究表明,对于痔疮手术,LigaSure和吻合器造成的疼痛均比电灼或剪刀剥离术少。本研究试图确定在未经挑选的一系列痔疮病患者中,哪种疼痛较轻的方法效果最佳。

方法

50例患者被随机分为接受吻合器痔上黏膜环切术或LigaSure痔切除术。所研究的参数包括疼痛(主要参数)、患者对治疗的满意度以及个人活动恢复情况。其他研究因素包括手术结果、操作的难易程度、镇痛需求和术后病程。

结果

在所有分析的主要方面,两种方法被发现是等效的。两组患者的术后疼痛评分(P = 0.99)、患者满意度(P = 1)和活动自我评估(P = 0.99)几乎相同。在所研究的众多因素中均未发现显著差异。

结论

无论痔疮病的分期和范围如何,这两种方法对患者而言都可安全使用且无重大弊端。

相似文献

1
Prospective, randomized study: proximate PPH stapler vs. LigaSure for hemorrhoidal surgery.前瞻性随机研究:痔切除术中近程吻合器与结扎速血管闭合系统的对比
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Aug;48(8):1517-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-005-0067-z.
2
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs. Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized trial.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与超声刀痔切除术对比:一项随机试验
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun;48(6):1213-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0918-z.
3
Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy.Ligasure 与开放性痔切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2002 Feb;89(2):154-7. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01993.x.
4
[First experience in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease using the PPH stapler].
Rev Invest Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;59(2):108-11.
5
A double-blind, randomized trial comparing Ligasure and Harmonic Scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.一项比较Ligasure和超声刀痔切除术的双盲随机试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Feb;48(2):344-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0845-z.
6
Ligasure vs. conventional diathermy in excisional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized study.结扎速血管闭合系统与传统电刀在痔切除术中的应用:一项前瞻性随机研究
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):940-4. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9214-7. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
7
Stapled technique for acute thrombosed hemorrhoids: a randomized, controlled trial with long-term results.吻合器技术治疗急性血栓性痔:一项具有长期结果的随机对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Apr;51(4):397-403. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9085-3. Epub 2007 Dec 21.
8
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of Starion vs Ligasure hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids.Starion与Ligasure痔切除术治疗脱垂性痔的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Aug;50(8):1146-51. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0260-3.
9
Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的长期疗效:尽管术后症状频发,但患者满意度较高。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Feb;50(2):204-12. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0768-y.
10
Ligasure Precise vs. conventional diathermy for Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.Ligasure Precise与传统电刀用于Milligan-Morgan痔切除术的前瞻性、随机、多中心试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 May;51(5):514-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9171-6. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease.意大利结肠直肠病统一学会(Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia)关于急慢性痔病管理的指南。
Ann Coloproctol. 2024 Aug;40(4):287-320. doi: 10.3393/ac.2023.00871.0124. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
A systematic review of the literature assessing the outcomes of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus open haemorrhoidectomy.系统评价文献评估吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与开放式痔切除术的结局。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Jan;25(1):19-33. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02314-6. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
3
Meta-analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy.
吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术与LigaSure 痔切除术的荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4799-807. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4799.
4
LigaSure Haemorrhoidectomy versus Conventional Diathermy for IV-Degree Haemorrhoids: Is It the Treatment of Choice? A Randomized, Clinical Trial.LigaSure痔切除术与传统透热疗法治疗IV度痔疮:它是首选治疗方法吗?一项随机临床试验。
ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011;2011:467258. doi: 10.5402/2011/467258. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
5
Staple Line Polyposis and Cytomegalovirus Infection after Stapled Haemorrhoidectomy.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术术后吻合口息肉病与巨细胞病毒感染
Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun 19;4(2):204-209. doi: 10.1159/000316634.
6
Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.吻合器痔固定术后的并发症、复发、早期和晚期再次手术:1233 例经验教训。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010 Nov;395(8):1049-54. doi: 10.1007/s00423-009-0543-3. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
7
Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy.随机对照试验比较 LigaSure 与闭合式 Ferguson 痔切除术。
Tech Coloproctol. 2009 Sep;13(3):243-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-009-0520-4. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
8
Ligasure versus diathermy hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia or pudendal block with ropivacaine: a randomized prospective clinical study with 1-year follow-up.脊髓麻醉或罗哌卡因阴部阻滞下Ligasure痔切除术与电刀痔切除术的比较:一项为期1年随访的随机前瞻性临床研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Sep;24(9):1011-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0715-1. Epub 2009 Apr 25.
9
Conventional versus LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy for patients with symptomatic Hemorrhoids.有症状痔患者的传统痔切除术与LigaSure痔切除术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jan 21;2009(1):CD006761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006761.pub2.
10
Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与Milligan-Morgan和Ferguson痔切除术的比较:一项系统评价
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Mar;24(3):335-44. doi: 10.1007/s00384-008-0611-0. Epub 2008 Nov 27.