• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

物种水平的遗传力得到重申:对“论地理分布范围大小的遗传力”的评论

Species-level heritability reaffirmed: a comment on "on the heritability of geographic range sizes".

作者信息

Hunt Gene, Roy Kaustuv, Jablonski David

机构信息

Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution, Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0116, USA.

出版信息

Am Nat. 2005 Jul;166(1):129-35; discussion 136-43. doi: 10.1086/430722. Epub 2005 May 31.

DOI:10.1086/430722
PMID:15937797
Abstract

For many current issues in macroevolution and macroecology, it is important to know to what degree the attributes of species are shared among closely related lineages, a concept sometimes referred to as species-level heritability. Recently, Webb and Gaston proposed a new method for analyzing the heritability of geographic range size and concluded that range size is not heritable in Cretaceous gastropods (data from Jablonski) and modern birds (their data). Here we show that Webb and Gaston's method is flawed in that it implicitly assumes that range sizes are uniformly distributed. When range size distributions show their characteristic strong right skew, Webb and Gaston's method spuriously tends to find that range sizes of closely related pairs of species are more dissimilar than the random expectation. A reanalysis of Jablonski's data finds range size to be robustly and strongly heritable in Cretaceous gastropods and less strongly but still significantly heritable in present-day birds.

摘要

对于宏观进化和宏观生态学中的许多当前问题而言,了解物种属性在密切相关的谱系之间共享的程度非常重要,这一概念有时被称为物种水平的遗传力。最近,韦伯和加斯顿提出了一种分析地理分布范围大小遗传力的新方法,并得出结论,分布范围大小在白垩纪腹足类动物(来自雅布隆斯基的数据)和现代鸟类(他们自己的数据)中是不可遗传的。在这里,我们表明韦伯和加斯顿的方法存在缺陷,因为它隐含地假设分布范围大小是均匀分布的。当分布范围大小分布呈现出其特有的强烈右偏态时,韦伯和加斯顿的方法会错误地倾向于发现密切相关的物种对的分布范围大小比随机预期的更不相似。对雅布隆斯基数据的重新分析发现,分布范围大小在白垩纪腹足类动物中具有强大且显著的遗传性,在现代鸟类中遗传性虽较弱但仍显著。

相似文献

1
Species-level heritability reaffirmed: a comment on "on the heritability of geographic range sizes".物种水平的遗传力得到重申:对“论地理分布范围大小的遗传力”的评论
Am Nat. 2005 Jul;166(1):129-35; discussion 136-43. doi: 10.1086/430722. Epub 2005 May 31.
2
On the heritability of geographic range sizes.论地理分布范围大小的遗传力。
Am Nat. 2003 Apr;161(4):553-66. doi: 10.1086/368296. Epub 2003 Mar 28.
3
Larval ecology, geographic range, and species survivorship in Cretaceous mollusks: organismic versus species-level explanations.白垩纪软体动物的幼虫生态学、地理分布范围及物种存活率:个体层面与物种层面的解释
Am Nat. 2006 Oct;168(4):556-64. doi: 10.1086/507994. Epub 2006 Aug 29.
4
Are range-size distributions consistent with species-level heritability?范围大小分布是否与种级遗传力一致?
Evolution. 2012 Jul;66(7):2216-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01581.x. Epub 2012 Feb 19.
5
Range size heritability in Carnivora is driven by geographic constraints.在食肉目动物中,范围大小的遗传力是由地理限制驱动的。
Am Nat. 2011 Jun;177(6):767-79. doi: 10.1086/659952.
6
Null models of geographic range size evolution reaffirm its heritability.地理分布范围大小演化的零模型再次证实了其遗传性。
Am Nat. 2007 Aug;170(2):221-31. doi: 10.1086/518963. Epub 2007 Jun 15.
7
Early penguin fossils, plus mitochondrial genomes, calibrate avian evolution.早期企鹅化石以及线粒体基因组校准了鸟类的进化历程。
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jun;23(6):1144-55. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj124. Epub 2006 Mar 13.
8
Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of cretaceous mollusks.种水平的遗传力:白垩纪软体动物地理分布范围的分析。
Science. 1987 Oct 16;238(4825):360-3. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4825.360.
9
Geographic range size and evolutionary age in birds.鸟类的地理分布范围大小与进化年龄
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Sep 22;267(1455):1843-50. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1219.
10
Biogeographical basis of recent phenotypic divergence among birds: a global study of subspecies richness.鸟类近期表型分化的生物地理基础:一项关于亚种丰富度的全球研究。
Evolution. 2007 Apr;61(4):942-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00068.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Geographic range size and rarity of epiphytic flowering plants.附生开花植物的地理分布范围大小与稀有性
Nat Plants. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-02022-9.
2
The environmental conditions of endemism hotspots shape the functional traits of mammalian assemblages.特有热点的环境条件塑造了哺乳动物组合的功能特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Mar 13;291(2018):20232773. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2023.2773.
3
The relationship between geographic range size and rates of species diversification.地理分布范围大小与物种多样化速率之间的关系。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 9;14(1):5559. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41225-6.
4
Using GIS to examine biogeographic and macroevolutionary patterns in some late Paleozoic cephalopods from the North American Midcontinent Sea.利用地理信息系统(GIS)研究北美中部大陆海一些晚古生代头足类动物的生物地理和宏观进化模式。
PeerJ. 2019 May 13;7:e6910. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6910. eCollection 2019.
5
Geographic range velocity and its association with phylogeny and life history traits in North American woody plants.北美木本植物的地理分布范围变化速度及其与系统发育和生活史特征的关联
Ecol Evol. 2018 Feb 5;8(5):2632-2644. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3880. eCollection 2018 Mar.
6
Approaches to Macroevolution: 2. Sorting of Variation, Some Overarching Issues, and General Conclusions.宏观进化的研究方法:2. 变异的分类、一些总体问题及一般性结论。
Evol Biol. 2017;44(4):451-475. doi: 10.1007/s11692-017-9434-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
7
Fossils, phylogenies, and the challenge of preserving evolutionary history in the face of anthropogenic extinctions.化石、系统发育,以及在人为灭绝面前保护进化史的挑战。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 21;112(16):4909-14. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409886112.
8
Mammalian niche conservation through deep time.通过深时保护哺乳动物小生境。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35624. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035624. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
9
Geographic location and phylogeny are the main determinants of the size of the geographical range in aquatic beetles.地理位置和系统发育是水生甲虫地理分布范围大小的主要决定因素。
BMC Evol Biol. 2011 Nov 28;11:344. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-11-344.
10
The comparative ecology and biogeography of parasites.寄生虫的比较生态学和生物地理学。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Aug 27;366(1576):2379-90. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0048.