Jablonski David
Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 5734 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637 USA.
Evol Biol. 2017;44(4):451-475. doi: 10.1007/s11692-017-9434-7. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
Approaches to macroevolution require integration of its two fundamental components, within a hierarchical framework. Following a companion paper on the origin of variation, I here discuss sorting within an evolutionary hierarchy. Species sorting-sometimes termed species selection in the broad sense, meaning differential origination and extinction owing to intrinsic biological properties-can be split into strict-sense species selection, in which rate differentials are governed by emergent, species-level traits such as geographic range size, and effect macroevolution, in which rates are governed by organism-level traits such as body size; both processes can create hitchhiking effects, indirectly causing the proliferation or decline of other traits. Several methods can operationalize the concept of emergence, so that rigorous separation of these processes is increasingly feasible. A macroevolutionary tradeoff, underlain by the intrinsic traits that influence evolutionary dynamics, causes speciation and extinction rates to covary in many clades, resulting in evolutionary volatility of some clades and more subdued behavior of others; the few clades that break the tradeoff can achieve especially prolific diversification. In addition to intrinsic biological traits at multiple levels, extrinsic events can drive the waxing and waning of clades, and the interaction of traits and events are difficult but important to disentangle. Evolutionary trends can arise in many ways, and at any hierarchical level; descriptive models can be fitted to clade trajectories in phenotypic or functional spaces, but they may not be diagnostic regarding processes, and close attention must be paid to both leading and trailing edges of apparent trends. Biotic interactions can have negative or positive effects on taxonomic diversity within a clade, but cannot be readily extrapolated from the nature of such interactions at the organismic level. The relationships among macroevolutionary currencies through time (taxonomic richness, morphologic disparity, functional variety) are crucial for understanding the nature of evolutionary diversification. A novel approach to diversity-disparity analysis shows that taxonomic diversifications can lag behind, occur in concert with, or precede, increases in disparity. Some overarching issues relating to both the origin and sorting of clades and phenotypes include the macroevolutionary role of mass extinctions, the potential differences between plant and animal macroevolution, whether macroevolutionary processes have changed through geologic time, and the growing human impact on present-day macroevolution. Many challenges remain, but progress is being made on two of the key ones: (a) the integration of variation-generating mechanisms and the multilevel sorting processes that act on that variation, and (b) the integration of paleontological and neontological approaches to historical biology.
宏观进化的研究方法需要在一个层次框架内整合其两个基本组成部分。继一篇关于变异起源的姊妹论文之后,我在此讨论进化层次结构中的分类过程。物种分类——有时在广义上被称为物种选择,即由于内在生物学特性导致的不同起源和灭绝——可分为狭义的物种选择,其中速率差异由诸如地理范围大小等新兴的物种层面特征所控制,以及效应宏观进化,其中速率由诸如体型等生物体层面特征所控制;这两个过程都可能产生搭便车效应,间接导致其他特征的增殖或衰退。有几种方法可以将涌现的概念操作化,因此越来越有可能严格区分这些过程。一种宏观进化权衡,由影响进化动态的内在特征所支撑,导致在许多进化枝中物种形成和灭绝速率共同变化,从而导致一些进化枝的进化波动较大,而另一些则较为平稳;少数打破这种权衡的进化枝能够实现特别丰富的多样化。除了多个层面的内在生物学特征外,外部事件也可以推动进化枝的兴衰,而特征与事件之间的相互作用虽然难以厘清,但却很重要。进化趋势可以通过多种方式在任何层次水平上出现;描述性模型可以拟合进化枝在表型或功能空间中的轨迹,但它们可能无法诊断过程,而且必须密切关注明显趋势的前沿和后沿。生物相互作用对一个进化枝内的分类多样性可能有负面或正面影响,但不能轻易从生物体层面这种相互作用的性质进行外推。宏观进化货币随时间的关系(分类丰富度、形态差异、功能多样性)对于理解进化多样化的本质至关重要。一种新颖的多样性 - 差异分析方法表明,分类多样化可能滞后、与差异增加同步或先于差异增加出现。一些与进化枝和表型的起源及分类相关的总体问题包括大规模灭绝的宏观进化作用、动植物宏观进化之间的潜在差异、宏观进化过程在地质时间内是否发生了变化,以及人类对当今宏观进化的影响日益增大。仍然存在许多挑战,但在两个关键挑战上正在取得进展:(a)变异产生机制与作用于该变异的多层次分类过程的整合,以及(b)古生物学和新生物学方法在历史生物学中的整合。