Saidova M A, Stukalova O V, Sinitsyn V E, Sergakova L M, Ataullakhanova D M, Botvina Iu V
Ter Arkh. 2005;77(4):11-4.
To compare different techniques of calculation of left ventricular myocardial mass (LVMM) by one-, two- and three-dimentional echocardiography (EchoCG) and by MRT.
We calculated LVMM by formulas Penn-cub and modified ASE in one-, two- and three-dimentional EchoCG regimes and MRT; evaluated structural-geometrical characteristics of the left ventricle at various stages of hypertension in 53 hypertensive patients (42 males and 11 females).
Mean LVMM values calculated according to two formulas in one-dimentional regime did not differ significantly but were higher than in two- and three-dimentional regimes. LVMM value according to three-dimentional EchoCG was closer to the results of the summation estimation in MRT.
Conventional EchoCG methods of LVMM calculation in M-regime (Penn-cub, ASE) overestimate the results. Most compatible with three-dimentional EchoCG results are those of EchoCG in two-dimentional regime (area-length).
比较通过一维、二维和三维超声心动图(EchoCG)以及磁共振成像(MRT)计算左心室心肌质量(LVMM)的不同技术。
我们通过一维、二维和三维EchoCG模式以及MRT中的Penn-cub公式和改良ASE公式计算LVMM;评估了53例高血压患者(42例男性和11例女性)在高血压不同阶段左心室的结构几何特征。
在一维模式下根据两个公式计算的平均LVMM值无显著差异,但高于二维和三维模式。三维EchoCG得出的LVMM值更接近MRT的总和估计结果。
M模式下传统的EchoCG计算LVMM的方法(Penn-cub、ASE)高估了结果。与三维EchoCG结果最相符的是二维模式下(面积-长度法)的EchoCG结果。