Suppr超能文献

[老年患者联合降压治疗不同方案的药理成本效益]

[Pharmacological cost-efficacy of various schemes of combined antihypertensive therapy in elderly patients].

作者信息

Red'kin Iu V, Nikolaev N A

出版信息

Ter Arkh. 2005;77(4):62-6.

Abstract

AIM

To validate optimal cost-effective pharmacological policy in combined therapy of elderly hypertensive patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 150 patients of a day hospital aged 55-74 years with at least stage II arterial hypertension of 4-40 years of duration a study was made of the cost efficacy of their combined treatment. The patients received lisinopril, metoprolol, nifedipin, enalapril, hypothiaside, indapamid. Clinical efficacy was assessed by the following criteria: a fall in systolic arterial pressure to at least 139 mm Hg or at least by 20% of the baseline, a fall in diastolic pressure to at least 89 mm Hg or 10% of the baseline. Economic parameters included cost of the disease, cost/effect values.

RESULTS

Combination egilok+hypothiaside was the cheapest but the least effective. Diroton+indap combination was cheaper than less effective combination cordipin-retard+hypothiaside and renitek-hypothiaside. Pharmacological and cost efficacy of diroton+indap combination was the highest.

CONCLUSION

Combination of lisinopril with indapamid was most adequate as to its cost and effect and can be used as a medication of the first line in elderly hypertensive patients.

摘要

目的

验证老年高血压患者联合治疗中最佳成本效益的药物治疗方案。

材料与方法

对日间医院的150例年龄在55 - 74岁、患有至少二期动脉高血压且病程为4 - 40年的患者进行联合治疗的成本效益研究。患者接受赖诺普利、美托洛尔、硝苯地平、依那普利、氢氯噻嗪、吲达帕胺治疗。临床疗效通过以下标准评估:收缩压降至至少139 mmHg或至少比基线降低20%,舒张压降至至少89 mmHg或比基线降低10%。经济参数包括疾病成本、成本/效果值。

结果

依那普利 + 氢氯噻嗪联合用药最便宜但效果最差。地洛特 + 吲达帕胺联合用药比效果较差的硝苯地平缓释片 + 氢氯噻嗪联合用药和雷米普利 - 氢氯噻嗪联合用药便宜。地洛特 + 吲达帕胺联合用药的药理和成本效益最高。

结论

赖诺普利与吲达帕胺联合用药在成本和效果方面最为合适,可作为老年高血压患者的一线用药。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验