Hayiou-Thomas Marianna E, Oliver Bonamy, Plomin Robert
Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, London.
J Learn Disabil. 2005 May-Jun;38(3):222-32. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380030401.
The present study addresses the distinction between specific (SLI) and nonspecific (NLI) language impairment at an etiological level by estimating the relative genetic and environmental contributions to language impairment in children with SLI and NLI. Drawing on a large longitudinal twin study, we tested a sample of 356 four-and-a-half-year-old children with low language ability and their twin partners at home on a range of language and nonverbal measures. For children whose language and nonverbal abilities were both low (NLI), genetic influence on language impairment was moderate and shared environmental influence was substantial. A similar pattern emerged for children whose language difficulties occurred in apparent isolation (SLI), although there was a trend for the genetic effects to be smaller for SLI than for NLI: Group heritability was .18 for SLI and .52 for NLI. Probandwise cross-concordances were suggestive of some genetic overlap between these two groups, but not with a subgroup of children with more severe cognitive delay.
本研究通过估计特定型语言障碍(SLI)和非特定型语言障碍(NLI)儿童语言障碍的相对遗传和环境影响,从病因学层面探讨这两种语言障碍之间的区别。基于一项大型纵向双胞胎研究,我们对356名语言能力较低的4.5岁儿童及其双胞胎伙伴进行了一系列语言和非语言测试。对于语言和非语言能力均较低的儿童(NLI),遗传对语言障碍的影响中等,共享环境影响较大。对于语言困难明显孤立出现的儿童(SLI)也出现了类似模式,尽管SLI的遗传效应有比NLI小的趋势:SLI的组遗传率为0.18,NLI为0.52。先证者交叉一致性表明这两组之间存在一些遗传重叠,但与认知延迟更严重的儿童亚组不存在遗传重叠。