Suppr超能文献

一项比较无张力腹股沟疝修补术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty.

作者信息

Chrysos Emmanuel, Athanasakis Elias, Antonakakis Sokratis, Xynos Evaghelos, Zoras Odysseas

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Heraklion, Medical School, University of Crete, Greece.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2005 Apr;71(4):326-9. doi: 10.1177/000313480507100410.

Abstract

Although still controversial, the use of diathermy instead of scalpel for skin incision and underlying tissue dissection is gradually gaining wide acceptance. This is due to the observation that no change in wound complication rates or postoperative pain are reported with the use of electrocautery. However, these studies include operations without the use of prosthetic materials during abdominal wall closure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that a) application of extreme heat may result in significant postoperative pain and poor wound healing because of excessive tissue damage and scarring respectively, and b) skin incision with the use of diathermy entails increased risk of wound infection in the presence of an underlying prosthetic material. One hundred twenty-five consecutive patients submitted to inguinal hernioplasty using the tension-free technique and fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the study were allocated alternately to either scalpel (n = 60), or diathermy (n = 57) groups. Eight patients had bilateral hernias. Five of them were allocated to the scalpel group and three to the diathermy group. According to the study protocol, they received both approaches for skin and underlying tissues incision, thus resulting in a total of 68 scalpel and 65 diathermy individual hernioplasties. Parameters measured included blood loss during the skin incision and underlying tissue dissection, postoperative pain and requirements for analgesics, the presence of wound dehiscence in the absence of infection, and postoperative wound infection on the day of discharge, on the day staples were removed, and 1 month after surgery. The two groups of patients were similar in relation to patient demographics, type of hernias, and operation details. Blood loss was minimal, and the amount of blood lost did not differ between the two groups. Diathermy group patients required less parenteral analgesics on the first postoperative day. A higher proportion of patients in the scalpel group continued to need oral analgesics on the second postoperative day compared to patients in the diathermy group. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of wound strength. Infectious complications were totally absent. The use of diathermy for skin incision during inguinal hernioplasty is as safe as the use of scalpel in terms of wound healing and reduces the analgesics requirements in the postoperative period.

摘要

尽管仍存在争议,但使用透热法而非手术刀进行皮肤切口和深层组织分离正逐渐被广泛接受。这是因为观察到使用电灼术时伤口并发症发生率和术后疼痛并无变化。然而,这些研究包括腹壁关闭时未使用假体材料的手术。本研究的目的是调查以下假设:a)由于分别存在过度的组织损伤和瘢痕形成,施加极热可能导致显著的术后疼痛和伤口愈合不良;b)在存在深层假体材料的情况下,使用透热法进行皮肤切口会增加伤口感染的风险。125例连续接受无张力技术腹股沟疝修补术且符合研究纳入标准的患者被交替分配至手术刀组(n = 60)或透热法组(n = 57)。8例患者为双侧疝。其中5例被分配至手术刀组,3例被分配至透热法组。根据研究方案,他们接受了两种皮肤和深层组织切口方法,因此总共进行了68例手术刀疝修补术和65例透热法疝修补术。测量的参数包括皮肤切口和深层组织分离期间的失血量、术后疼痛及镇痛药需求、无感染情况下伤口裂开的情况,以及出院当天、拆除缝线当天和术后1个月时的术后伤口感染情况。两组患者在患者人口统计学、疝的类型和手术细节方面相似。失血量极少,两组之间的失血量无差异。透热法组患者术后第一天所需的胃肠外镇痛药较少。与透热法组患者相比,手术刀组中更高比例的患者在术后第二天仍需要口服镇痛药。两组在伤口强度方面无差异。完全没有感染性并发症。在腹股沟疝修补术中,就伤口愈合而言,使用透热法进行皮肤切口与使用手术刀一样安全,并且可减少术后镇痛药的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验