• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期正中剖腹手术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的随机临床试验。

Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.

作者信息

Kearns S R, Connolly E M, McNally S, McNamara D A, Deasy J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x
PMID:11136307
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electrocautery is used increasingly for tissue dissection, although fears of excessive scarring and poor wound healing have curtailed its widespread use for skin incision. This study compared electrosurgical incision with traditional scalpel incision.

METHODS

One hundred patients requiring elective midline laparotomy were randomized prospectively to either scalpel or diathermy incision. Parameters measured included incision time, wound size, wound blood loss, total intraoperative blood loss and postoperative wound pain. All wound complications were recorded.

RESULTS

The two groups did not differ significantly in relation to patient or wound characteristics. Laparotomy incisions using diathermy were significantly quicker than scalpel incisions (mean(s. e.m.) 6.1(0.4) versus 7.5(0.5) s/cm2; P < 0.04). There was significantly less blood loss in the diathermy group compared with the scalpel group (0.8(0.1) versus 1.7(0.3) ml/cm2; P = 0.002). Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the diathermy group for the first 48 h after operation (P < 0.05). Morphine requirements were also significantly lower over the first 5 postoperative days in the diathermy incision group (P < 0.04). There was no difference between groups in wound complications before discharge and at the 1-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Electrosurgical midline incision in elective surgery has significant advantages over scalpel use on the basis of incision time, blood loss, early postoperative pain and analgesia requirements.

摘要

背景

电灼术越来越多地用于组织解剖,尽管对过度瘢痕形成和伤口愈合不良的担忧限制了其在皮肤切口方面的广泛应用。本研究比较了电外科切口与传统手术刀切口。

方法

100例需要择期正中剖腹术的患者被前瞻性随机分为手术刀组或透热疗法组。测量的参数包括切口时间、伤口大小、伤口失血量、术中总失血量和术后伤口疼痛。记录所有伤口并发症。

结果

两组在患者或伤口特征方面无显著差异。使用透热疗法的剖腹术切口明显比手术刀切口快(平均值(标准误)6.1(0.4)对7.5(0.5)秒/平方厘米;P<0.04)。与手术刀组相比,透热疗法组的失血量明显更少(0.8(0.1)对1.7(0.3)毫升/平方厘米;P = 0.002)。术后第1个48小时内,透热疗法组的术后疼痛评分明显更低(P<0.05)。在术后的前5天,透热疗法切口组的吗啡需求量也明显更低(P<0.04)。两组在出院前和1个月随访时的伤口并发症方面无差异。

结论

在择期手术中,电外科正中切口在切口时间、失血量、术后早期疼痛和镇痛需求方面比使用手术刀具有显著优势。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy.择期正中剖腹手术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2001 Jan;88(1):41-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01625.x.
2
Randomized clinical trial of diathermy versus scalpel incision in elective midline laparotomy (Br J Surg 2001; 88: 41-4).
Br J Surg. 2001 Aug;88(8):1129. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01882-7.x.
3
A prospective study comparing diathermy and scalpel incisions in tension-free inguinal hernioplasty.一项比较无张力腹股沟疝修补术中透热疗法与手术刀切口的前瞻性研究。
Am Surg. 2005 Apr;71(4):326-9. doi: 10.1177/000313480507100410.
4
Midline versus transverse incision in major abdominal surgery: a randomized, double-blind equivalence trial (POVATI: ISRCTN60734227).腹部大手术中中线切口与横切口的比较:一项随机、双盲等效性试验(POVATI:ISRCTN60734227)
Ann Surg. 2009 Jun;249(6):913-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181a77c92.
5
A comparative study of scalpel and surgical diathermy incision in elective operations of head and neck cancer.手术刀与手术电刀在头颈癌择期手术中切口的比较研究
Indian J Cancer. 2011 Apr-Jun;48(2):216-9. doi: 10.4103/0019-509X.82904.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incision.系统评价和荟萃分析:比较电切与手术刀用于皮肤切口。
Br J Surg. 2012 May;99(5):613-20. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8708. Epub 2012 Feb 24.
7
Comparison of superficial surgical site infection following use of diathermy and scalpel for making skin incision in inguinal hernioplasty.腹股沟疝修补术中使用电刀和手术刀进行皮肤切口后浅表手术部位感染的比较。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;12(4):371-4.
8
Randomized double-blind trial comparing the cosmetic outcome of cutting diathermy versus scalpel for skin incisions.随机双盲试验比较电刀切割与手术刀切开皮肤切口的美容效果。
Br J Surg. 2015 Apr;102(5):489-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9751. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
9
Comparison of electrocautery incision with scalpel incision in midline abdominal surgery - A double blind randomized controlled trial.电切术与手术刀在中线腹部手术中的比较——一项双盲随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.085. Epub 2015 May 26.
10
Advantages of a new technique of neck dissection using an ultrasonic scalpel.使用超声刀进行颈部清扫新技术的优势
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;35(1):10-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2006.10.007. Epub 2007 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of electrosurgery and steel scalpel surgery for umbilical herniorrhaphy in bovine calves: A comparative analysis.电外科手术与手术刀手术治疗犊牛脐疝修补术的临床疗效:一项对比分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 24;11(1):e41454. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41454. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
2
Use of a bipolar vessel-sealing device in 27 canine limb amputations.双极血管闭合装置在27例犬肢体截肢手术中的应用。
Can Vet J. 2024 Dec;65(12):1260-1267.
3
PlasmaBlade versus Electrocautery for Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Harvesting in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Outcome Study.
自体乳房重建中使用等离子刀与电灼法获取腹壁下深动脉穿支皮瓣的比较临床结局研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 19;13(8):2388. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082388.
4
Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial.电灼针尖端与钢手术刀切开在神经外科中的比较:一项前瞻性单中心随机对照双盲试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 14;13(11):e073444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444.
5
Comparing the intraoperative and postoperative complications of the scalpel and electrocautery techniques for severing the inner layers of the lumbar disc during discectomy surgery.比较椎间盘切除术期间使用手术刀和电灼技术切断腰椎间盘内层的术中和术后并发症。
Front Surg. 2023 Sep 28;10:1264519. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1264519. eCollection 2023.
6
Post-skin incision scar tissue assessment using patient and observer scar assessment scales: A randomised controlled trial.使用患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表进行皮肤切口后瘢痕组织评估:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Nov 1;71:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.103006. eCollection 2021 Nov.
7
Healing comparison of porcine cutaneous incisions made with cold steel scalpel, standard electrosurgical blade, and a novel tissue dissector.使用冷钢手术刀、标准电外科刀片和新型组织切割器制作的猪皮肤切口的愈合比较。
Med Res Innov. 2017 Oct;1(5). doi: 10.15761/MRI.1000124. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
8
Evaluation of Electrocautery and Stainless Steel Scalpel in Oral Mucoperiosteal Incision for Mandibular Anterior Fracture.电灼术与不锈钢手术刀在下颌前部骨折口腔黏骨膜切口应用中的评估
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jul-Dec;9(2):230-234. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_158_18.
9
Pilonidal sinus disease: Preliminary case-control study on heat-related wound dehiscence.藏毛窦疾病:关于热相关伤口裂开的初步病例对照研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Aug 18;48:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.07.032. eCollection 2019 Dec.
10
Neurofibromatosis Type 1: Review of Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Tumor Treatment on Quality of Life.1型神经纤维瘤病:皮肤和皮下肿瘤治疗对生活质量的综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jan 18;7(1):e1982. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001982. eCollection 2019 Jan.