Nano Maria Teresa, Gill Peter Grantley, Kollias James, Bochner Melissa Anne, Carter Nicholas, Winefield Helen R
Adelaide University, Division of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
ANZ J Surg. 2005 Jun;75(6):445-53; discussion 371-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03388.x.
Breast reconstruction is an integral part of the surgical management of women with breast cancer. It is often performed by plastic surgeons but, in some centres, it is performed by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery. We evaluated the objective and subjective outcomes of reconstruction for breast cancer at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit (Adelaide, Australia) between 1990 and June 2002.
A chart analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent breast cancer reconstruction at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit with analysis of type of reconstruction and complications. Patients were interviewed and self-assessment quality of life questionnaires (FACT-B, body image), and overall satisfaction with reconstruction using an analogue scale were performed. Three observers carried out photographic analysis of the reconstructions. A comparison was then made between the different forms of reconstruction used.
One hundred and ninety-two patients underwent a total of 219 breast reconstructions during this period. The reconstructions included 18 latissimus dorsi mini flaps, 83 tissue expander/implants, 43 latissimus dorsi flaps and 75 TRAM flaps. There were no perioperative deaths. Significant systemic complications occurred in four patients (2%). Significant implant related complications occurred in four patients (3.2% of patients with implants). Total flap loss occurred in four patients (2.9% of flaps). One hundred and twenty-three patients were able to be contacted and completed the questionnaires. Overall 77% of patients were highly satisfied with breast reconstruction and 82% scored a satisfactory result on photographic analysis. All four forms of reconstruction rated highly with respect to quality of life, body image, patient satisfaction and photographic assessment.
Breast reconstruction undertaken by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic techniques has been performed with an acceptable rate of complications and a high level of patient satisfaction. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was similar across the four methods of reconstruction used.
乳房重建是乳腺癌女性手术治疗的一个重要组成部分。通常由整形外科医生进行,但在一些中心,也由接受过乳房重建和肿瘤整形手术培训的乳腺外科医生进行。我们评估了1990年至2002年6月期间澳大利亚阿德莱德皇家医院乳腺科乳腺癌重建的客观和主观结果。
对在阿德莱德皇家医院乳腺科接受乳腺癌重建的所有患者进行病历分析,分析重建类型和并发症。对患者进行访谈,并使用生活质量自评问卷(FACT-B、身体形象),以及用视觉模拟评分法评估对重建的总体满意度。三名观察者对重建情况进行了照片分析。然后对所使用的不同重建形式进行比较。
在此期间,192例患者共进行了219次乳房重建。重建方式包括18例背阔肌微型皮瓣、83例组织扩张器/假体、43例背阔肌皮瓣和75例横行腹直肌肌皮瓣。无围手术期死亡病例。4例患者(2%)出现严重全身并发症。4例患者(占植入假体患者的3.2%)出现与假体相关的严重并发症。4例患者(占皮瓣的2.9%)出现皮瓣完全坏死。123例患者能够取得联系并完成问卷。总体而言,77%的患者对乳房重建高度满意,82%的患者在照片分析中获得满意结果。所有四种重建方式在生活质量、身体形象、患者满意度和照片评估方面评分都很高。
由接受过乳房重建和肿瘤整形技术培训的乳腺外科医生进行的乳房重建,并发症发生率可接受,患者满意度高。在所使用的四种重建方法中,患者对乳房重建的满意度相似。