Robins Paul M, Smith Suzanne M, Glutting Joseph J, Bishop Chanelle T
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Department of Psychology, 3405 Civic Center Blvd., CSH 15, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Pediatr Psychol. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(5):397-408. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsi063. Epub 2005 Feb 23.
To investigate whether the combination of standard medical care (SMC) and short-term cognitive-behavioral family treatment (CBT) in the treatment of recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) was more effective than SMC alone.
Children recently diagnosed with RAP via physician examination were randomized into SMC (n = 29) and SMC plus CBT (n = 40) groups. Outcome measures included multiple dimensions of child and parent reported child pain, somatization, and functional disability, and school absences and physician contacts.
Children and parents participating in the combined SMC + CBT intervention reported significantly less child and parent reported child abdominal pain than children in the SMC intervention immediately following the intervention and up to 1 year following study entry, as well as significantly fewer school absences. Significant differences in functional disability and somatization were not revealed.
These results, in combination with previous studies, add support to the effectiveness of CBT intervention in reducing the sensory aspects of RAP. Results are discussed with respect to the cost-benefit of integrated medical and short-term psychological services.
探讨标准医疗护理(SMC)与短期认知行为家庭治疗(CBT)联合治疗复发性腹痛(RAP)是否比单纯的SMC更有效。
通过医生检查最近被诊断为RAP的儿童被随机分为SMC组(n = 29)和SMC加CBT组(n = 40)。结果指标包括儿童和家长报告的儿童疼痛、躯体化、功能残疾的多个维度,以及学校缺勤和就医次数。
参与SMC + CBT联合干预的儿童和家长报告的儿童腹痛明显少于SMC干预组的儿童,无论是在干预后立即还是在研究开始后的1年内,且学校缺勤次数也明显更少。未发现功能残疾和躯体化方面的显著差异。
这些结果与先前的研究相结合,为CBT干预在减轻RAP的感觉方面的有效性提供了支持。讨论了综合医疗和短期心理服务的成本效益。